Publications

Accessibility


North Dakota Fresh Market Potato Cultivar/Selection Trial Results for 2020 (A1783-20, Jan. 2021)

Potato cultivars or selections included in this report were selected from recently released cultivars, advancing selections with release potential (numbered lines progressing through the trial process), or cultivars that are new to the U.S. Standard potato cultivars used by growers served as checks. The agronomic data presented in Tables 1 and 2 were analyzed statistically. These analyses allow the reader to ascertain, at a predetermined level of confidence, if the differences observed among cultivars/selections are reliable, or if they might be due to error inherent in the experimental process.

Andy Robinson, Extension Potato Agronomist, NDSU/University of Minnesota

Susie Thompson, Potato Breeder and Associate Professor, NDSU; Eric Brandvik, Research Specialist, NDSU; Peter Ihry, Agriculture Technician, NDSU

Availability: Web only


harvesting potatoes
Photo by Andy Robinson, NDSU/UMN

Potato cultivars or selections included in this report were selected from recently released cultivars, advancing selections with release potential (numbered lines progressing through the trial process), or cultivars that are new to the U.S. Standard potato cultivars used by growers served as checks. For comparison, studies conducted in 2019 evaluated red- and yellow-skinned fresh potatoes (https://z.umn.edu/Potato2019).

In 2020, two trials were conducted to identify traits of red- and yellow-skinned potato cultivars and advanced selections at Hoople, N.D. Nineteen red-skinned cultivars and 30 yellow-skinned cultivars were evaluated. Plots were established in a commercial, nonirrigated potato field utilizing common potato-production practices. The authors acknowledge J.G. Hall and Sons for hosting these trials.

Prior to planting, urea at 120 pounds of nitrogen (N) per acre was broadcast and incorporated. A randomized complete block design with four replicates was utilized. Seed tubers were hand cut to approximately 2-ounce seed pieces prior to planting; an exception was the cultivar Obama, which was planted using whole
seed tubers.

Tubers were planted on May 21, 2020, in a single row with 9-inch within-row spacing. Plots were 3 feet wide and 30 feet long.

A majority of the plants emerged by June 12 in both trials. Stand and stem counts on 10 plants in a row in each plot was taken on July 9. Vine length was measured on three plants from the base of the plant to the vine tip on Aug. 12.

Vigor evaluation was completed on Aug. 12. A rating of 1 indicated least vigor and 5 greatest vigor. Vines were desiccated on Aug. 21 and 28 with diquat. Plots were harvested on Sept. 10 and 11 with a single-row plot harvester.

After harvest, potatoes were stored at 55 F until grading. The tuber size profile distribution was determined by sorting all potatoes harvested into C size (less than 1.875 inches), B size (1.875 to 2.25 inches), A size (2.25 to 3.5 inches) and Chef size (greater than 3.5 inches). Total yield is a summation of C + B + A + Chef.

The agronomic data presented in Tables 1 and 2 were analyzed statistically. These analyses allow the reader to ascertain, at a predetermined level of confidence, if the differences observed among cultivars/selections are reliable or if they might be due to error inherent in the experimental process.

The LSD (least significant difference) values beneath the columns apply only to the numbers in the column in which they appear. If the difference between two cultivars/selections exceeds the LSD value at 0.05 or 0.10, it means that with 95% or 90% confidence, respectively, the higher-yielding cultivar/selection has a significant yield advantage. When the difference between two cultivars/selections is less than the LSD value, no significant difference was found between the two under these growing conditions.

The CV stands for coefficient of variation and is expressed as a percentage. The CV is a measure of variability in the trial. Large CVs mean a large amount of variation that could not be attributed to differences in the cultivars/selections.

The data provided does not indicate endorsement or approval by the authors, or NDSU Extension or University of Minnesota Extension. Reproduction of the tables is permissible if presented with all the same information found in this publication (meaning no portion is deleted and the order of the data is not rearranged).

The authors acknowledge the contribution of cultivars and advanced selections for this work from the breeding programs at North Dakota State University, University of Minnesota, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Colorado State University, University of Wisconsin, University of Maine, Michigan State University, EBE Farms, Northern Konstar Potatoes, Parkland Seed, Real Potato, Solanum, Southern Potato and SunRain.

Figure 1. Daily rainfall from May 21 to Sept. 11, 2020, from the North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network weather station near Crystal, N.D.

daily precipitation during trial testing period in 2020

 

Table 1. Agronomic performance and graded yield of red-skinned potato cultivars/selections near Hoople, N.D., 2020.

Cultivar/Selection Stand1 Stems/plant2 Vine length3 Vigor4 C5 B A Chef Total yield Specific gravity

 

%

number

inch

 

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ cwt/a ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

Autumn Rose

91

3.9

26

4.0

17

155

67

1

239

1.082

Cerata

83

4.5

35

2.8

5

115

208

2

330

1.073

CO99076-6R

91

4.5

25

4.0

8

147

157

0

311

1.083

Cristina

84

3.8

26

4.0

7

167

195

3

373

1.078

Dark Red Norland

84

4.9

26

3.3

2

66

284

19

370

1.074

Dark Red Norland (Real Potato)

85

3.5

29

3.3

2

85

218

4

308

1.073

MSW 343-2R

84

2.9

26

3.8

4

101

242

8

356

1.066

ND113207-1R

84

4.2

27

3.8

16

139

128

0

283

1.068

ND13241C-6R

81

4.6

30

4.0

45

205

19

0

270

1.088

ND1431Y-2R

81

3.5

26

4.0

4

110

212

9

336

1.076

ND1455Y-1R

79

3.1

24

3.8

5

126

64

0

195

1.072

NDAF113484B-1

89

2.6

22

4.0

2

55

242

10

309

1.071

Red Norland

88

3.8

25

3.3

2

84

231

8

326

1.075

Red Pontiac

90

4.3

28

4.3

7

86

197

6

295

1.074

Red Prairie

89

3.4

27

3.8

10

209

99

0

318

1.074

Roko

82

3.6

29

4.5

5

139

183

0

327

1.080

Sangre

55

1.5

27

4.3

4

40

90

6

139

1.061

W8890-1R

92

5.4

28

3.8

14

150

133

1

299

1.075

W8893-1R

86

3.7

23

2.8

4

102

139

3

249

1.072

Column mean

84

4

27

4

9

121

164

4

298

1.075

CV %

9

17

13

13

21

25

25

126

16

0.2

LSD 0.05

11

0.9

5

0.7

6

36

59

7

68

0.004

LSD 0.10

9

0.8

4

0.6

5

30

49

6

57

0.003

1 Stand count was taken on July 9 (seven weeks after planting) by counting every emerged plant and dividing by the number planted.
2 Stems per plant were counted on 10 plants on July 9 (seven weeks after planting) and are shown as the average number of stems per plant.
3 Vine length was measured on three plants from the base of the plant to the vine tip on Aug. 12.
4 Vigor evaluation was completed on Aug. 12 (12 weeks after planting). A rating of 1 indicated least vigor and 5 greatest vigor.
5 Potatoes were sorted on a Kerian Speed sizer as C = less than 1.875, B = 1.875-2.25, A = 2.25-3.5 and Chef = greater than 3.5 inches.

potato field
photo by Andy Robinson, NDSU/UMN

Table 2. Agronomic performance and graded yield of yellow-skinned potato cultivars/selections near Hoople, N.D., 2020.

Cultivar/Selection

Stand1

Stems/plant2

Vine length3

Vigor4

C5

B

A

Chef

Total yield

Specific gravity

 

%

number

inch

 

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ cwt/a ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

A00286-3Y

84

3.6

31

4.3

25

160

206

0

391

1.080

A06336-2Y

79

4.1

27

3.8

27

147

172

1

348

1.076

Actrice

85

3.9

29

2.8

9

96

411

17

533

1.069

Agata

89

3.7

24

3.8

18

182

284

4

489

1.071

Alegria

83

3.8

31

4.0

14

156

315

7

491

1.082

Arizona

82

4.2

29

3.5

17

186

265

19

486

1.071

Belmonda

86

4.1

33

4.0

97

191

175

0

463

1.084

CO05037-3W/Y

86

7.8

26

2.0

81

240

52

0

372

1.081

CO10064-1W/Y

83

4.7

30

4.0

75

209

77

0

360

1.101

CO11250-1W/Y

84

6.0

28

3.5

74

208

46

0

329

1.094

CO11266-1W/Y

89

4.8

32

4.5

72

196

41

0

309

1.082

Crop 56

88

4.5

34

4.8

42

236

73

1

352

1.084

Crop 58

84

3.6

28

3.5

10

123

225

25

384

1.078

Crop 80

84

4.5

31

3.8

26

146

213

0

384

1.082

Electra

81

4.1

34

5.0

22

168

280

7

476

1.072

Jelly

81

2.8

31

5.0

9

115

191

1

317

1.077

Lanorma

84

3.8

33

3.8

15

156

209

0

380

1.076

Milva

80

4.1

31

4.0

24

156

295

3

477

1.077

Montreal

85

3.9

26

3.0

26

137

296

9

468

1.077

MN04844

47

1.2

22

3.8

15

31

48

0

93

1.076

Musica

83

4.5

32

3.3

23

247

257

1

528

1.080

ND1487-1Y

84

4.7

32

4.0

57

248

126

0

431

1.078

ND1241-1Y

83

2.9

27

4.0

36

131

157

0

323

1.105

NDA081451CB-1CY

83

4.3

30

4.0

56

184

145

0

385

1.086

Melody

84

3.3

32

4.0

40

155

241

5

442

1.074

Noelle

81

5.6

31

2.0

72

231

80

0

383

1.069

Obama

85

4.9

29

3.0

24

245

268

3

541

1.072

Paroli

81

3.8

29

3.8

10

82

310

54

457

1.070

W15240-2Y

81

3.4

29

3.0

12

134

184

0

329

1.073

W9576-11Y

86

4.0

30

2.8

15

154

337

11

517

1.069

Mean

82

4.1

30

3.7

35

168

199

6

408

1.079

CV

8

22

9

13

85

19

23

180

16

0.3

LSD p=0.05

10

1.3

4

0.7

42

45

64

14

94

0.005

LSD p=0.10

8

1

3

0.6

35

38

54

12

78

0.004

1 Stand count was taken on July 9 (seven weeks after planting) by counting every emerged plant and dividing by the number planted.
2 Stems per plant were counted on 10 plants on July 9 (seven weeks after planting) and are shown as the average number of stems per plant.
3 Vine length was measured on three plants from the base of the plant to the vine tip on Aug. 12.
4 Vigor evaluation was completed on Aug. 12 (12 weeks after planting). A rating of 1 indicated least vigor and 5 greatest vigor.
5 Potatoes were sorted on a Kerian Speed sizer as C = less than 1.875, B = 1.875-2.25, A = 2.25-3.5 and Chef = greater than 3.5 inches.

 

Funding for this publication was made possible by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service through grant 19-439. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA.

This work was supported by funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant 2019-34141-30284.

NDSU does not endorse commercial products or companies even though reference may be made to tradenames, trademarks or service names.

Filed under: crops, crops-potatoes
Creative Commons License
Feel free to use and share this content, but please do so under the conditions of our Creative Commons license and our Rules for Use. Thanks.