You are here: Home Columns Renewable Accounts Renewable Accounts: The Rules of the Game
 
Document Actions

Renewable Accounts: The Rules of the Game

Images
David Ripplinger, Bioproducts and Bioenergy Economist and Assistant Professor, NDSU Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics David Ripplinger, Bioproducts and Bioenergy Economist and Assistant Professor, NDSU Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics
Last November, the EPA proposed slashing mandated volumes of ethanol with the reasoning that the nation does not have the infrastructure or fleet to use such large amounts.

By David Ripplinger, Bioproducts and Bioenergy Economist and Assistant Professor

NDSU Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics

I’m trying to wrap my head around the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announced delay of final 2014 biofuel mandates.

Here’s a little background for those who don’t follow federal biofuels policy closely.

We have a federal law, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which mandates minimum biofuel use by type and year through 2022. By November, the EPA is required to finalize mandates for the upcoming year. That includes lowering the mandates in the event of expected economic harm or inadequate supply.

Last November, the EPA proposed slashing mandated volumes with the reasoning that the nation does not have the infrastructure or fleet to use such large amounts of ethanol. Note that the EPA was already late because the final rule was supposed to be out by that time, not just the proposed rule.

The proposal was applauded by the oil and gas industry, which hasn’t been a big fan of the RFS, and criticized by the renewable fuels industry. The latter didn’t like the reduction in volume but especially was confused by the reasoning.

Now, a year later, the EPA has announced that it will finalize the 2014 volumes in February.

This past year, I’ve used the analogy of a game where players don’t know how the score is kept. I started using the analogy in May when the game “was almost at halftime.” Last month, it was updated to when the game “was almost over.” Now it looks like the players may get a text within a couple of hours of the game’s conclusion.

I shouldn’t make light of the situation because fuel is serious business. However, this situation is frustrating, if not absurd, so a little levity may be in order.

So what does this mean? I’m not sure. There are experts who claim they do, and nearly every industry group is claiming victory, which I find surprising because no one knows the rules or the score.

I’m confident that this is bad news for advanced biofuels. These are the prospects hoping to play in the future but don’t know if they should be hitting the weights, doing cone drills or polishing their resume for a future outside of sports, hopefully as a K Street lobbyist.


NDSU Agriculture Communication – Nov. 25, 2014

Source:David Ripplinger, (701) 231-5265, david.ripplinger@ndsu.edu
Editor:Rich Mattern, (701) 231-6136, richard.mattern@ndsu.edu
Columns
Spotlight on Economics: Spotlight on Economics: Waters of the United States  (2017-10-10)  Now may be the time for the legislative branch to clarify the scope of the Clean Water Act.  FULL STORY
BeefTalk: BeefTalk: Long-term Cow-culling Rate, Replacement Rate and Cow Age  (2017-10-19)  Knowing how your herd compares with industry numbers is important.  FULL STORY
Prairie Fare: Prairie Fare: Prairie Fare Celebrates 20 Years  (2017-10-19)  The column has covered topics from apples to zucchini and everything in between.   FULL STORY
 
Use of Releases
The news media and others may use these news releases in their entirety. If the articles are edited, the sources and NDSU must be given credit.
 

Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System