Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension CenterNorth Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Phone: (701) 742-2744, FAX: (701) 742-2700, E-mail: Walter.Albus@ndsu.edu

 

Material & Methods index

Barley variety trial

Corn hybrid performance trial

Dry edible bean trials

Hard red spring wheat variety trial

Onion hybrid performance trial

Potato variety trial, processing

Potato variety development agronomic and storage trials

Soybean variety trial

Soybean breeding project

Crop Production Management Studies

Corn row width and hybrid study

Strip-till, corn on corn nitrogen rate study

Strip-till, corn on soybean nitrogen rate study

Strip-till vs conventional tillage in onion

Sugar beet tillage hybrid trial

Optimum corn stover removal for bio-fuel and the environment

Farm Extension Activities

 

 

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

Barley Variety Trial

                                                                                   

             Irrigation allows producers to achieve yield goals which results in better N utilization and improved quality in malting barley.  With the use of intensive crop production techniques (fungicide applications, split N applications, etc.) high yields of high quality barley can be achieved. 

            The objective of this study is to find barley varieties that are viable in irrigated cropping systems in Southeastern, ND and to develop and demonstrate agronomic practices that promote barley production

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Embden sandy loam and Gardena loam; soil-N 48 lb/acre; soil-P and soil-K was very high; soil‑S was medium.

Previous crop:

2008 – soybean; 2007 – cabbage and onion; 2006 – barley and wheat.

Seedbed Preparation:

No-tilled with a Horsch Anderson plot drill.

Planting:

Planted on April 22 with a Horsch Anderson plot drill.  Planting rate was 3 bu/acre (1,500,000 seeds/acre).

Plots:

Plots were 37 ft long by 7.5 ft wide.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

April 21 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8.   Apply 11 lbs N/acre and 36 lbs P2O5/acre as 10‑34-0 at planting.  Stream bar applied 30 lbs N/acre on May 15 and 40 lbs N/acre on May 25 as 28-0-0.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Apply Wolverine (1.7 pt/acre) on May 21, apply Headline (6 oz/acre) on May 28, Tilt (4 oz/acre) on June 15 and Proline (2.55 oz/acre) on June 20 and June 22 and Folicur (4 oz/acre) on June 23.

Harvest:

Harvested on August 6 with a Hege plot combine.  Harvest area was a five foot section from the middle of the plot 37 feet long.

 

RESULTS

        Four, six-row malting barley varieties: Drummond, Lacey, Stellar-ND and Tradition have been tested for four years under irrigation at this site.  Their medium-short stature and strong to very strong straw strength resist lodging.  These four varieties have averaged 112.8 bu/ac, 11.5% protein, 94.1% plump and 1.6% thin from 2006 – 2009.  Pinnacle, a two-row variety, has been tested for two years and has had the lowest grain protein content each year.  Celebration and Rasmusson were also tested in 2009.  Both yielded well.  Rasmusson had lower grain protein content and was shorter than other 6-row varieties.

Go to Barley variety trial table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Corn Hybrid Performance Trial

     Corn for grain commands the most irrigated acres of all crops in North Dakota.  The fact that significant differences in the accumulation of growing degree units for corn and other weather related issues exist across the state, it is vital that corn hybrids be tested in specific locations and regions.  It is the goal of this trial to provide yield and other agronomic parameters for corn growers in southeastern, North Dakota.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Egeland loam and Maddock sandy loam; soil-N 40 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crops:

2008 – pinto bean and soybean; 2007 – field corn; 2006 – field corn.

Seedbed preparation:

Coulter chisel on April 23.

Planting:

Planted April 28 in 30-inch rows.  Thinned to 33,800 plants/acre.

Fertilizer:

April 22 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8. Stream bar applied 60 lbs N/acre as 32-0-0 on May 1.  Sidedress 110 lbs of N/acre as 28-0-0 on June 10. 

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed

Pest

Control:

Outlook (1 pt/acre) on May 1, Buctril (1 pt/acre) + Atrazine (0.5 lb ai/acre) May 21 and hand weeding controlled weeds. 

Harvest:

Harvested with a plot combine on November 19 and November 20.  Harvest area was two rows 17 feet long

 

Go to the Corn Hybrid Performance Trial table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Dry Edible Bean Variety Trials

 

            Dry edible beans play a significant role in irrigated rotations in Southeastern ND.  As Universities and private companies develop new varieties it is important to test them upon their release.  Many producers have gone to direct harvesting of dry edible beans including pinto beans. Pinto beans have historically been knifed windrowed and harvested with a bean combine.  Therefore it is imperative to test the determinate, upright, short vine pinto varieties that facilitate direct harvesting and compare their yield to the upright vine and vine types.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Pinto bean - Maddock sandy loam and Embden Loam; navy and miscellaneous bean - Embden loam: soil-N 61 lb/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was low.

Previous crop:

2008 - wheat; 2007 - soybean and carrot; 2006 - carrot, onion and barley.

Seedbed Preparation:

Coulter chisel on April 24.  Disk and multiweed (field cultivate) twice on May 14 to incorporate herbicide and multiweed on May 21.

Planting:

Planted all edible beans on May 22.

Plots:

Plots were 17 ft long by 7.5 ft (3 rows) wide.  There were 4 reps.

Fertilizer:

April 21 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8 to all beans.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Trust (1˝ pt/acre) on May 14, Raptor (4 oz/acre) + NIS (0.25%v/v) on June 18, Basagran (1 qt/acre) on June 25 for weed control.  Proline (5 oz/acre) on July 8, July 14 and July 24 and Quadris (6.2 oz/acre) on July 18 and July 24 for disease control.

Harvest:

Hand harvested August 31 to September 8 when mature. 

Harvest area for all bean varieties was: the center row (seventeen feet). Beans were bagged, dried and threshed with a stationary plot thresher.

 

Go to the edible bean table (Select one)

Misc dry edible bean table    Navy bean table    Pinto bean table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page


 

 


Hard Red Spring Wheat Variety Trial

Many of the acres historically planted to hard red spring wheat (HRSW) in Southeastern ND have been replaced by corn and soybeans.  Soybeans have been the dominant crop to replace wheat in rotations.  The rapid and near universal acceptance of Roundup ready soybean varieties has accelerated this decline in wheat acres.  During this same time frame, a number of wet, humid cropping seasons resulted in a significant reduction in wheat yields due to disease, especially head scab.  Whereas wheat yields in ND seemed to have reached a plateau, corn and soybean yields were increasing.  Despite this scenario, several researchers and producers using intensive management in wheat are having different results.  In intensive management, all areas of production from plant population, seeding depth, fungicide applications, nitrogen rate, time of application, weed control, etc, are closely monitored.  Healthy wheat plants that lodge less result in higher yields, and grain protein content. 

            The objective of this trial is to test HRSW varieties for yield and other agronomic parameters grown with intensive management in an irrigated environment.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Embden loam and Gardena loam; soil N-48 lb/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crop:

2008 – soybean; 2007 - onion; 2006 – cabbage and wheat.

Seedbed Preparation:

No-tilled with a Horsch Anderson plot drill.

Planting:

Planted on April 23 with a Horsch Anderson plot drill.  Planting rate was 1.7 bu/acre (1,500,000 seeds/acre).

Plots:

Plots were 37 ft long by 7.5 ft wide.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

April 21 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8.   Apply 11 lbs N/acre and 36 lbs P2O5/acre as 10‑34-0 at planting.  Stream bar applied 30 lbs N/acre on May 15, forty lbs N/acre on May 25 and 20 lbs N/acre on June 2 as 28-0-0.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Apply Wolverine (1.7 pt/acre) on May 21, apply Headline (6 oz/acre) on May 28, Tilt (4 oz/acre) on June 15 and Proline (2.55 oz/acre) on June 24 and June 26 and Folicur (4 oz/acre) on June 29.

Harvest:

Harvested on August 22 with a Hege plot combine.  Harvest area was a five-foot section from the middle of the plot 37 feet long.

 

RESULTS

            Yield, test weight, grain protein, plant height, and maturity were significantly different among varieties.  Yields were 68.1 bu/ac in 2009 compared to the three year average of 69.4 bu/ac.  Although Glenn was the lowest yielding variety in 2009, it had the highest grain protein and test weight.  Faller was the highest yielder and had the lowest grain protein.  Due to low grain protein levels in the ND crop in 2009 discounts for protein below 14% were steep.  If we assume a $0.15 price reduction for every 0.2% protein decline below 14%, Faller would  gross $285.76/ac compared to Glenn at $295.30/ac using the three average grain yield and protein content.  In years of low protein discounts Faller would gross significantly more.

 

Go to the Hard Red Spring Wheat Variety Trial table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page


Onion Hybrid Performance Trial

Onions have done well under irrigation in ND.  Onions are predominately yellow sweet Spanish.  Some red onions are also produced.  This study tested 32 sweet Spanish and 2 red hybrids. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Maddock sandy loam; soil N-32 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were high; soil‑S was low.

Previous crops:

2008 – barley; 2007 – soybean; 2006 – field corn.

Seedbed preparation:

Strip-tilled April 24 utilizing a narrow shark toothed residue manager with an anhydrous point on the shank and 13-inch fluted closing coulters.  This configuration, with minimal angle (less aggressive) on the coulters, tilled a 6-inch non-bermed band in the soil.

Planting:

Direct seeded onions (285,000 seeds/acre; later thinned to 180,000 plants/acre) on May 4 with a Monosem precision planter.  Onions were planted: 2 lines per row with 2.5 inches between lines and rows on 16-inch centers.

Plots:

Plots were 3 ft (two rows) wide by 17 ft long.  The study had 4 reps.

Fertilizer:

April 22 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8.  Stream-bar applied 30 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 on June 2, June 22, July 6 and July 23.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Weeds were controlled using Select (8 oz/acre) + COC (1% v/v) and Buctril (4 oz/acre) on May 29; Goaltender (4 oz/acre) on June 9; Buctril (1 pt/acre) + Goal 2EC (0.6 oz/acre) on June 29, Select (8 oz/acre) + COC (1.0% v/v) on July 11 and hand weeding.

Harvest:

Onions were pulled on September 24 to September 28 and were dried.  Onions were graded October 6 to November 16.

 

RESULTS

          Sedona, Delgado and Crocket averaged 856, 809 and 760 cwt/ac respectively from 2007-2009.  Delgado, Sedona and Crocket averaged

 577, 58, and 493 cwt/ac in the greater than 3 inch size from 2007-2009. 

                                                                             

Go to the Onion Hybrid Performance Trial table 

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Processing Potato Variety Trial

 

Asunta (Susie) Thompson, Walt Albus, Nick David, Richard Nilles and Bryce Farnsworth 

 

Potato continues to be the most important vegetable and horticultural crop grown in North Dakota and the Northern Plains.  Traditionally, North Dakota State University (NDSU) potato cultivar releases have been widely adapted and accepted, significantly impacting production in North Dakota, Minnesota, the Northern Plains, and often throughout North America.  The NDSU potato breeding program was established more than 75 years ago as part of the North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station (NDAES).  Since 1930, 24 cultivars have been named and released by the NDAES, in cooperation with the USDA-ARS, and others; additional collaborative releases with state Agricultural Experiment Stations, the USDA-ARS, and Agriculture Canada have also occurred.  As a leader in potato breeding, selection, and cultivar development, our goal is to identify and release superior, multi-purpose cultivars that are high yielding, possess multiple resistances to diseases, insect pests, and environmental stresses, have excellent processing and/or culinary quality, and that are adapted to production in North Dakota, Minnesota, and the Northern Plains.  The potato improvement team emphasizes late blight, cold-sweetening, Colorado potato beetle, pink rot and Pythium leak, silver scurf, sugar end, and aphid and virus resistance breeding.  In 2009, we initiated an accelerated effort to develop Verticillium wilt resistant cultivars with Dr. Neil Gudmestad’s research program in Plant Pathology.  This effort is in response to producer needs to aid in production of an economically and environmentally sustainable crop.  In order to develop durable and long-term resistance to pests and stresses, breeding efforts continue to include germplasm enhancement to incorporate important pest resistances and improved quality traits via exploitation of wild species and wild species hybrids, in addition to the use of released cultivars and advanced germplasm from around the globe.  Breeding, evaluation, and screening efforts are successful because of the cooperative and interdisciplinary efforts amongst the NDSU potato improvement team, the North Dakota State Seed Department (NDSSD), and with potato producers, research and industry personnel in ND, the Northern Plains, and North America.

 

In order to meet the needs of potato producers, the potato industry and consumers, we have established the following research objectives:

1)  Develop potato (Solanum tuberosum Group Tuberosum L.) cultivars for North Dakota, the Northern Plains, and beyond, using traditional hybridization that are genetically superior for yield, market-limiting traits, and processing quality.

2)  Identify and introgress into adapted potato germplasm, genetic resistance to major disease, insect, and nematode pests causing economic losses in potato production in North Dakota and the Northern Plains.

3)  Identify and develop enhanced germplasm with resistance to environmental stresses and improved quality characteristics for adoption by consumers and the potato industry.

 

Research activities in 2009 ranged from research trial and seed production sites from Langdon to Oakes in North Dakota.  Potato cultivar development is a long process requiring 10 to 20 years from hybridizing to naming and release.  It involves interdisciplinary teams which evaluate multiple characteristics required by producers and the industry.  As with other crops, potato is influenced by seed quality, cultural practices, and the environment.  The NDSU potato improvement team works with the North Dakota State Seed Department to certify production from greenhouse seedling crops through advanced field generations.  Potatoes in North Dakota are primarily produced from Trail County and north to the Canadian border, and from the Red River west to Towner County.  However, during the past 20 plus years, production has moved westward to Kidder, Williams, Emmons and southward to Richland, Ransom and Sargent Counties.  At these new and/or expanding locations, potatoes are grown on irrigated, sandy soils.  The advantages of production in these areas include more consistent yield and quality compared to non-irrigated production areas.  In 2009, russet-skinned cultivars accounted for 61% of production, while white-skinned cultivars accounted for 23%, reds 15%, and yellow fleshed cultivars 1%.  About 60% of potatoes produced in ND and MN are russets for French fry processing.  Production in the Oakes area is primarily for processing by one of two North Dakota plants producing French fries and other frozen processed products.   Yield and evaluation trials were grown at three irrigated (Larimore, Oakes, and Inkster) and two non-irrigated locations (Hoople and Crystal).  The following narrative and tables summarize our 2008 and 2009 research efforts at Oakes.  The Oakes processing trials evaluated 15 and 20 clones, respectively in 2008 and 2009.  Advancing selections with processing potential from the NDSU potato breeding program were compared to several industry standards and new cultivars developed by the Tri-State program (ID, WA, OR).  These replicated trials aid in identifying superior selections with potential for naming and release, assist in identification of strengths and shortcomings of new cultivars and advancing selections, and facilitate development of cultivar specific management profiles, in addition to providing adaptation information. 

The highlight of 2009 was the release of AOND95249-1Russ as Dakota TrailBlazer, in December.  It offers producers and processors Verticillium wilt, pink rot, sugar end, and late blight (field) resistance, in addition to outstanding French fry/frozen processing and tablestock properties.  Dakota TrailBlazer has very high specific gravity, long dormancy, and cold sweetening resistance, processing reliably from 42F storage.  The most promising dual-purpose russet selections in our program include ND8229-3, AOND95292-3Russ, and ND8068-5Russ; all possess excellent appearance and processing qualities.  Characteristics of these selections are summarized in the pages following the 2009 research evaluation tables.

Finally, we would like to acknowledge the encouragement, funding, and resources received from the Oakes area producers, the NPPGA and MN Area II Potato Research Council, JR Simplot Co., Cavendish Farms, and RD Offutt Co. Farm Division, certified seed from Justin Dagen, Mike Jorde, and RD Offutt Co., and the assistance of Leonard Besemann and Heidi Eslinger in maintaining the research plot.

Go to top of Processing Potato Variety Trial

 

                                                    MATERIALS AND METHODS

Location:                                 Oakes Irrigation Research Site, Oakes, ND

 

Soil type:                                 Sandy loam

 

Dates:

            Planting:                      April 29, 2008

            Vine Kill:                      October 8, 2008

Harvest:                      October 8, 2008

            Days to harvest:          163

 

Plot information:

Row width:                  36 inches

Seed spacing:             12 inches

Hills per plot:               20

Replicates:                  4

 

Method of planting:                 2-row Harriston plot planter; a fungicide seed piece treatment (Maxim MZ) was applied at cutting.

 

Method of vine kill:                  Flailing

 

Method of harvest:                  Single row digger, pickup by hand

 

Fertilizer:                                 April 22 – 28 lbs N/ac, 44 lbs P205/ac, 55 lbs K20/ac, 22 lbs S/ac as 10-16-20-8

June 25 -30 lbs N/ac applied as 32-0-0 via stream-bar

July 1 – 30 lbs N/ac applied as 32-0-0 via stream-bar

July 10 – 30 lbs N/ac applied as 32-0-0 via stream-bar

July 16 – 20 lbs N/ac applied as 32-0-0 via stream-bar

July 24 – 20 lbs N/ac applied as 32-0-0 via stream-bar

 

Herbicide applied:                   June 25 - Matrix (1.5 oz/ac) + Sencor DF (14 lb/ac) + NIS (0.25% v/v).  Also handweeded to control weeds.

 

Irrigation:                                 Linear – 13.2 inches over season per ET

 

Fungicides applied:                 July 10 – Dithane (2 lb/ac)

July 17 – Amistar (5 oz/ac)

July 25– Dithane (2 lb/ac)

                                                July 31- Amistar (5 oz/ac)

Aug. 7– Dithane (2 lb/ac)

Aug 22– Dithane (2 lb/ac)

 

Insecticides applied:                Belay (12 oz/ac) applied in furrow with planter. 

 

Go to 2008 Processing Potato Table

Go to top of Processing Potato Variety Trial

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Location:                                 Oakes Irrigation Research Site, Oakes, ND

 

Dates:

            Planting:                      May 2, 2009

            Vine kill:                       Flailed on September 7, 2009

            Harvest:                      October 8, 2009

            Days to vine kill:          128 days

            Days to harvest:          159 days

 

Plot information:

Row width:                  36 inches

Seed spacing: 12 inches

Hills per plot:               20

Replicates:                  4

 

Method of planting:           2-row Harriston plot planter, Admire Pro (8 oz/acre) applied in-furrow.  Seed piece treatment (Tops MZ) was applied at cutting on April 28.

Method of harvest:                  Machine - single row digger and hand pick up

 

Irrigation:                                 Linear – 12.05 inches applied May through September per ET

 

Fertilizer:                                 April 21 – 30 lbs. N/ac, 43 lbsP2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/ac, 22 lbs S/ac as 11-16-20-8

May – 50 lbs. N/a applied as 32-0-0

June 22 -10 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

June 29 – 20 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

July 6 – 30 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

July 15 – 20 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

July 20 – 20 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

July 29 – 10 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

Aug. 3 - 10 lbs. N/ac applied as 28-0-0 via stream-bar

 

Herbicide applied:                   June 9 - Matrix (1 oz/ac) + Lexone (1/3 lb/ac) + Dual (1 ˝ pt/ac) + NIS (0.125% v/v)

 

Fungicides applied:                 June 26 – Dithane (2 lbs/a)

July 2 - Amistar (5 oz/a)

July 11 – Dithane (2 lbs/a)

July 17 – Amistar (5 oz/a)

July 24– Dithane (2 lbs/a)

July 31- Amistar (5 oz/a)

Aug. 5– Dithane (2 lbs/a)

Aug 14 – Bravo ZN (2 pts/a)

Aug. 21 – Bravo ZN (2 pts/a)

Aug. 28 – Bravo ZN (2 pts/a)

Sept. 3 – Bravo ZN (2 pts/a)

 

Comments:                             Hail week of June 14

 

Go to 2009 Processing Potato Tables

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Potato Variety Development

Agronomic and Storage Trials

Oakes, ND – 2009

 

Principal Investigators:

Nick David – Extension Potato Agronomist, North Dakota State University

Susie Thompson – Potato Breeder, North Dakota State University

Christian Thill – Potato Breeder, University of Minnesota

Walt Albus – Research Agronomist, North Dakota State University

Marty Glynn – Food Technologist and Potato Worksite Supervisor, USDA ARS

 

Summary

Twelve potato varieties were grown at the Oakes Irrigation Research Site to determine their potential to provide high-quality raw product to local processors.  Total yields of 395 – 520 cwt/acre were achieved during 2009; however, usable yields ranged from 154 – 467 cwt/acre depending upon variety.  MN18747 (467 cwt/a), Alpine Russet (466 cwt/a), Umatilla Russet (427cwt/a), and Russet Burbank (421 cwt/a) had the highest usable yields of the varieties tested, while Premier Russet (154 cwt/a) and Gemstar Russet (232 cwt/a) had the lowest. Specific gravities were acceptable for all varieties tested, except MN18747 (1.070) which was too low and could lead to crop rejection. Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar Russet, and MN18747 had the best fry scores at harvest with 100% 0 color using the USDA fry color chart. Further studies investigating nitrogen fertilization of promising new varieties, such as Alpine Russet and Dakota Trailblazer are warranted in south-eastern North Dakota.

 

Introduction:

One of the goals of the extension potato agronomy program at North Dakota State University and the University of Minnesota is to provide growers with research-based information that can be used to make well informed production decisions. The objective of this project was to evaluate advanced breeding clones and recently-released potato varieties grown in south-eastern North Dakota for potential use as frozen process raw product. Specific objectives were to evaluate and determine if varietal differences existed in: 1)Total yield, 2)Tuber size profile distribution, 3)Usable yield by size class, 4)Specific gravity, 5)Tuber length:width ratio, 6)Internal tuber defects, 7)External tuber defects, 8) Percent usable yield, 9)Tuber sucrose and glucose levels following 0, 3, 6, and 9 months storage, and 10) Fry color following 0, 3, 6, and 9 months storage.

 

General Materials and Methods:

This study was conducted at the Oakes Irrigation Research Site on a Maddock sandy loam soil. The area was previously cropped to field corn (2006 & 08) and soybean (2007). Following corn harvest, the spring tillage practices included using a double disc with coulter and airway to a depth of 8-10 inches. Two additional field cultivations were performed on 1 May to incorporate pre-plant fertilizer.

 

Fertility and Irrigation - The residual soil nitrogen from the previous crop of field corn was 34 lb/acre. Soil sulfur tested medium while phosphorus and potassium were very high. A pre‑plant, broadcast application of 30N- 43P- 52K- 22S was applied as 11-26-20-8 on 21 April. During planting, an additional 20N- 70P- 0.5Zn- 0.1B was applied as a liquid band below the seed piece. Immediately before hilling on 28 May, 50N was applied as 28-0-0. Subsequent stream-bar applications of 10, 20, 30, 20, 20, 10, and 10 lb/acre of nitrogen as 28-0-0 were made on 22, 29 June, 6, 15, 20, 29 July, and 3 August, respectively. Overhead sprinkler applications during May (1.0”), June (1.5”), July (4.3”), August (4.0”), and September

(0.75”) supplemented natural rainfall during the growing season.

 

Pest management - Pink rot (Phytopthora erythroseptica) was controlled by applying 0.42 oz/ 1000 linear ft row Ridomil Gold EC (mefenoxam). Following the final cultivation on 9 June, weeds were controlled with 1 oz/acre Matrix (rimsulfuron), 1.5 pt/acre Dual II Magnum (metolachlor), and 0.33 lb/acre Lexone (metribuzin). Early and Late blight were controlled with 2 lb/acre Dithane (26 June, 11, 24 July, & 5 Aug), 5 oz/acre Amistar (2, 17, and 31 July), and 2 pt/acre Bravo Zn (14, 21, 28 Aug & 3 September). Early season Colorado potato beetle and aphid control was achieved with an in-furrow application of 12 oz/acre of Belay (chlothianidin).

 

Treatment Materials and Methods

Plot design, planting, and harvest – Treatments (potato variety) were assigned in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Individual plots were 2 potato rows (6’) wide x 20 pieces (20’) long. Certified potato seed of all varieties tested (Figures 1 – 12) were hand cut into 2-2.5 ounce pieces on 4 May, treated with Maxim MZ, and suberized for 7 days at 50°F and 95% relative humidity. Plot were planted on 11 May with a 2-row, assist-feed Harriston planter. Vines were mechanically flailed on 7 September and all potatoes were harvested from each plot using a single-row Grimme harvester.

 

Yield evaluations – Following harvest, all potatoes were transported to the USDA Potato Worksite in East Grand Forks, MN, where total yield, size profile distribution, usable yield by size class, specific gravity, and length:width ratios were determined.

 

Quality evaluations – Quality evaluations were done at both the USDA Potato Worksite in East Grand Forks, MN, and by Ag World Support Systems at J.R. Simplot in Grand Forks, ND.

 

Statistical analysis – Analysis of variance was performed using PROC GLM in SAS v.9.3 and when significant, means were separated using least significant differences.

 

Results:

Objective 1 – (Total Yield)

Total yields achieved during 2009 ranged from 395 – 520 cwt/acre and analysis of variance indicated significant differences existed between the twelve varieties tested (Table 1). Russet Burbank had the highest total yield numerically, but was statistically equal to MN18747, Alpine Russet, and Umatilla Russet. Bannock Russet, Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar Russet, MN02419, MN15620, Premier Russet, Prospect, and Ranger Russet all had significantly lower total yields than Russet Burbank.

 

Objective 2 – (Tuber size profile)

Analysis of variance indicated significant differences between varieties existed in all tuber size classes (< 3, 3 – 4, 4 – 6, 6 – 8, 8 – 10, and over 10 ounces) evaluated (Table 1). Russet Burbank, Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar Russet, MN18747, Premier Russet, and Prospect had the lowest yield of tubers less than 3 ounces, while MN 15620 and Umatilla Russet had the highest. MN02419, MN15620, MN18747, and Umatilla Russet had the highest yield of 6 – 8 ounce tubers, and Alpine Russet, Russet Burbank, MN02419, MN15620, MN18747, and Umatilla Russet had the highest yield of 8 – 10 ounce tubers. Alpine Russet and Gemstar Russet had the highest yield of tubers greater than 10 ounces.

 

Objective 3 – (Usable Yield over 3 oz) Usable yields ranged from 363 – 473 cwt/acre and analysis of variance indicated significant differences existed (Table 2). Alpine Russet, Russet Burbank, MN18747, and Umatilla Russet had the highest usable yield of varieties tested. Bannock Russet, Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar, Premier Russet, and Prospect had significantly lower usable yield than Russet Burbank. Russet Burbank, Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar Russet, and Prospect had the highest percentage of usable yield above 6 ounces, while MN02419, MN15620, MN18747, Ranger Russet, and Umatilla Russet had a lower usable yield greater than 6 ounces compared to Russet Burbank. Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar Russet, Premier Russet, and Prospect had the highest percentage of usable yield above 10 ounces and they were significantly greater than Russet Burbank.

 

Objective 4 – (Specific gravity)

Average (Table 2) and size class (Table 3) specific gravities for each variety were determined at the USDA Potato Worksite in East Grand Forks, MN. Russet Burbank had an average specific gravity of 1.087 during 2009. All varieties except MN18747 (1.070), Prospect (1.081), Ranger Russet, (1.092), and Dakota Trailblazer (1.096) had gravities of 1.084 – 1.088. The specific gravity of MN18747 is below the rejectable level of 1.075 used by some processors.

 

Objective 5 – (Length:Width ratio)

The length:width ratio describes the overall shape of potato tubers and is a good indicator of french fry length and process plant recovery. Round tubers have a L:W ratio near 1.0 and result in short french-fries with low recovery rates. As a result, varieties with low L:W ratios are not desirable for the french-fry industry. As the L:W ratio increases to 1.50 – 1.75 tubers are described as blocky or oblong. L:W ratios above 1.75 are described as long or elongated and result in long french-fries with the greatest recovery. Average (Table 2) and size class specific (Table 3) L:W ratios were determined for all varieties evaluated. During 2009, Russet Burbank had an average L:W ratio of 2.0. The blockiest varieties (L:W ratio = 1.6 – 1.7) were Alpine Russet, Bannock Russet, Dakota Trailblazer, MN15620, MN18747, and Prospect. The only variety with a greater L:W ratio than Burbank was Ranger Russet. The most elongated varieties (L:W > 1.7) were Russet Burbank, Gemstar Russet, MN02419, Premier Russet,

Ranger Russet, and Umatilla Russet.

Objectives 6 – (Internal defects), 7 – (External defects), and 8 – (Percent usable yield)

Following sizing at the USDA facility in East Grand Forks, all replicates were combined and a 500 lb sample of each variety was delivered to Ag World Support Systems at J.R. Simplot in Grand Forks, ND immediately following harvest for quality evaluations (Table 4). The most prominent internal defect was hollow heart and ranged from 0 – 57% depending upon variety. Russet Burbank (10%), Bannock Russet (15%), Gemstar Russet (38%), and Premier Russet (57%) all had levels of hollow heart (>9%) that could lead to crop rejection by the processor. External defects ranged from 2 – 8% in 2009, with soft rot and sunburn being the most prevalent cause. Total usables ranged from a low of 36 to a high of 93% in the varieties tested. Alpine Russet, Dakota Trailblazer, MN18747, Prospect, and Ranger Russet all had over 90% usables, compared to 81% for Russet Burbank.

 

Objective 9 – (Tuber sucrose and glucose levels following 0, 3, 6, and 9 months storage)

The results for the sucrose and glucose levels were not available at the time the report was

written, but will be included in a final report presented in August.

 

Objective 10 – (Fry color following 0, 3, 6, and 9 months storage)

Following sizing at the USDA facility in East Grand Forks, all replicates for each variety were combined and tuber samples were taken for fry analysis following 0, 3, 6, and 9 months storage at 48°F. Data for the 0 month fry time is reported here. Fries from Russet Burbank showed some color with only 83% having a score of 0 on the USDA Color Chart, while 16% had a color score of 2. All varieties tested, except Umatilla Russet (75%), had a higher percentage of 0 color fries than Russet Burbank during 2009. One-hundred percent of fries from Dakota Trailblazer, Gemstar, and MN18747 had a color score of 0, the best possible score.

 

Go to Potato Variety Development Agronomic and Storage tables

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

Soybean Variety Trial

            Soybeans are a major dryland crop in central and Southeastern ND.  Historically dry edible beans have pre-empted soybeans in irrigation rotations in this area of the state.  The present market price for soybeans and less risk in their production have resulted in more irrigated acres.  It is the purpose of this trial to provide producers with yield and agronomic information on soybean varieties in an irrigated environment.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Maddock sandy loam; soil N-34 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil‑K were very high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crop:

2008 – field corn; 2007 ‑ soybean; 2006 – field corn.

Seedbed

Preparation:

Disked twice April 21, coulter chisel once April 22, disk once and multiweed (field cultivate) twice on May 14.

Planting:

Planted soybeans on May 15 in 30-inch rows. 

Plots:

Plots were 17 ft long by 5 ft (2 rows) wide.  There were 4 reps.

Fertilizer:

April 22 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Trust (1.5 pt/acre) on May 14, Extreme (2Ľ pt/acre) + Roundup (16 oz/acre) + NIS (˝ pt/100 gal) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 15, Roundup (32 oz/acre) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on July 10.  Proline (5 oz/acre) on July 8, July 15 and July 22.

Harvest:

Harvested on October 13 with a plot combine.

 

RESULTS

            Grain yield, plant lodging, seed oil and protein %, and test weight were significantly affected by variety. Yields were 61.6 bu/ac compared to the three year mean of 62.7 bu/ac.  Interestingly, varieties that matured by September 20, or earlier, yielded within 0.2 bu/ac of varieties that matured after September 20.

 

Go to the Soybean Variety Trial table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Soybean Breeding Project

Ted Helms, NDSU Department of Plant Sciences

 

Four different breeding experiments were conducted at the Oakes Irrigated Research and Extension Center in 2009.  These experiments are combined with testing at other sites to provide information regarding how experimental soybean lines perform in diverse environments.  The best experimental lines are then advanced to the next stage of testing or perhaps released as named cultivars.  The released cultivars are then distributed to farmers to grow on their farms.  Oakes is an especially useful testing site because of the high yield and the tendency for the plants to grow tall and lodge, due to the application of irrigation.  Those genotypes that are susceptible to lodging can then be identified and discarded.  Farmers do not want cultivars that are susceptible to lodging and Oakes is the best location to identify lodging problems.  The four experiments consisted of an experiment to evaluate natto types for the value-added specialty market, an experiment to evaluate tofu types for the value-added specialty market, an early experimental line test and a late experimental line test.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Conventional soybean, early and late - Embden sandy loam and Hecla sandy loam; soil-N 46 lbs/acre; soil-P, soil-K and soil-S were very high.  Natto soybean – Embden sandy loam and Maddock sandy loam; soil-N 19 lbs/acre, soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was low.  Tufo – Hecla sandy loam and Maddock sandy loam; soil-N 18 lbs/acre, soil P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crop:

Conventional soybean early and late: 2008 – field corn; 2007 – edible bean; 2006 – soybean.   Natto and tufo soybean:  2008 – onion; 2007 – barley and wheat; 2006 – field corn, sugar beet and onion.

Seedbed

Preparation:

Coulter chisel on April 23, disk once and multiweed (field cultivate) twice on May 14.

Planting:

Planted all soybeans on May 20, in 30-inch rows. 

Plots:

Plots were 17 ft long by 5 ft (2 rows) wide.  All studies had 3 reps.

Fertilizer:

April 23 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

All studies:  Apply Trust (1.5 pt/acre) on May 14, Raptor (5 oz/acre) + NIS (0.25% v/v) + AMS (12 lb/100 gal) on June 18, Basagran (1 qt/acre) on June 25.   Proline (5 oz/acre) on July 8, July 15 and July 22.

Natto and tufo: Cultivate on June 29 and July 1.  Apply Basagran (1.5 pt/acre) + COC (1 pt/acre) on July 15.

Harvest:

Harvested on October 13 with a plot combine.

 

Go to the Soybean Breeding Project Table (Select one)

Natto soybean  Tufo soybean   Conventional soybean early  Conventional soybean late  

 

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Corn Row Width and Hybrid Study

 

            A three year study on corn row width and population from 2006-2008 showed no significant yield advantage to 15-inch or 30-inch paired rows over 30-inch rows.  Increasing population increased yield up to 35,000 plants/ac. The lack of response to narrower rows goes against research at this site in the 70’s and 80’s.  Although the lack of response to narrow rows the past three years has been very consistent, row width is such a major decision in planter selection that the row with part of this study will be continued.  Since 15-inch rows gives the most inter-row plant spacing it was decided to just compare 15-inch rows and 30-inch rows.  There is no reason to test other row configurations if we don’t see a yield advantage in 15-inch rows.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Maddock sandy loam.  soil-N 40 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crop:

2008 – edible bean and soybean; 2007 – field corn; 2006 – field corn and soybean.

Seedbed Preparation:

Coulter chisel April 23 and multiweed (field cultivate) May 13.

Planting:

Planted on May 14 in 30-inch and 15-inch row spacing.

Plots:

Plots were 157 ft long by 11 ft wide.  Plots with 30-inch row spacing had 4 rows; plots with 15-inch spacing had 8 rows.  Corn was planted at 38,000 seeds per acre.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

Broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11‑16-20-8 on April 22.   Applied 60 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 on May 15.  Stream bar 90 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 on June 9.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Apply Status (6 oz/acre) + Roundup (22 oz/acre) + NIS (0.25% v/v) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 3 and Roundup (32 oz/acre) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 25.

Harvest:

Hand harvested R5 on September 14, September 25; R6 on October 26.  Harvest area was a 10 foot by 5 foot section from each plot (two rows from the 30-inch row plots and four rows from the 15-inch row plots).   November 19 the remainder was harvested and recorded with a weigh wagon.  The entire length, 157 feet, was harvested (four rows 30 inch spacing and eight rows from the 15 in spacing). 

 

RESULTS

            DeKalb DKC 43-31, and Pioneer 9494XR and Crows 1807 showed no yield response to 15-inch rows over 30-inch.  This is the fourth year (2006-2009) in which corn row width has not statistically affected yield.  This is surprising and contrary to past data.  Corn grown in 20-inch rows had a 12 bu/acre yield advantage over corn in 30-inch rows at this same site when studies from 1977-78 and 1980-82 are averaged.

 

Go to the Corn row width and hybrid study table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

 


Strip-Till, Corn on Corn, Nitrogen Rate Study

 

Corn grain production has made amazing increases in both yield and number of acres planted ND in the past 12 years.  Figure 1 shows the corn acres planted and total bushels harvested in ND from 1997-2009.  We are currently planting about 2.2 million acres of corn and producing about 260 million bushels annually.  The current 2009 estimate of 208 million bushels of corn produced in ND includes about 33 percent of the crop to be harvested in the spring of 2010.

            It is estimated that if all ethanol and high fructose corn sweetener plants in the State were operating and the Williston and Scranton plants came on line they would use about 225 million bushels of corn annually  Although corn for several of these plants comes from out of State, corn acres must increase in ND to meet future demand.  Increasing corn acres in Southeastern ND will require more continuous corn in crop rotations.  Conventional grown continuous corn requires extensive tillage with high fuel use.  Continuous corn requires about 40 lb more N/acre than corn grown on soybean ground.  Fuel and fertilizer prices have increased dramatically with higher energy costs. 

            It is the objectives of this study to grow continuous corn in a strip-till system that eliminates full width tillage and to find efficient nitrogen rates. 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Embden sandy loam and Helca sandy loam; soil-P and soil-K was high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crop:

2008 - field corn; 2007 - field corn; 2006 – field corn.

Seedbed preparation:

Strip-tilled on May 6, with a Orthman strip-till machine.

Planting:

Planted on May 8 in 30-inch rows @ 33,000 seeds/acre.

Hybrid:

Dekalb DCK46-60

Plots:

Plots were 137 ft long by 20 ft (8 rows) wide.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

May 6, during strip-till operation, banded 12 lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5 as 10-34-0, May 12 band applied 8 lbs N/acre and 17 lbs S/acre as 12-0-0-26, May 12 applied 30 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 on all plots except the zero N-rate plots,  June 10 applied N as 28-0-0 for a total of 100, 150 and 200 lbs total N/acre on the respective N-rate treatments (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 lbs N/acre).

Irrigation:

Hand move sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Lumax (3 pt/acre) + Atrazine (1.5 lbs ai/acre) on May 29.

Harvest:

Harvested on November 18 with a JD 4400 combine.  Harvest area was the middle four rows of each plot 137 feet long.

 

RESULTS

            Increasing nitrogen rates (N) increased grain yield, chlorophyll meter readings green index, and grain protein.  Remote sensing did an excellent job of predicting corn N status.  Green reflectivity in plots from aerial digital photography is inversely related to N rate.  In this study the green reflectivity number was subtracted from 256 (number representing maximum reflectivity) to calculate a green index number.  The higher the green index, the greener the corn tissue.  Although the amount of corn residue has stabilized in these continuous corn plots (corn from 2006 to 2007) seedling growth was suppressed in the higher N rate treatments from 2007 to 2008.  To help counter this we went to an aggressive spring strip-till operation in the spring of 2009 in which we strip-tilled to an 8-inch depth and set fluted closing coulters 12 inches apart operating to a 4-inch depth to make a 12-inch wide black strip to plant corn in.  For the most part this was successful. With the high volume of residue pushed away in the higher N rate plots there was still some plant residue falling back into the rows after planting. To help prevent the immobilization of the pre-emerge N application that was broadcast in past years the application was applied in a 10-inch band over the row in 2009.  Although aggressive strip-tilling and banding the pre-emerge N application were positive steps to promote the growth of seedling and small corn plants some additional steps are required.  To further facilitate optimum uptake of plant N prior to side-dress the total amount of fertilizer N applied pre-emerge will be upped to 75 lb/ac and applied with the strip-till operation and/or applied in a dribble band in 2010.  Side-dress applications of fertilizer N will be applied in-between every row instead of every other row as in the past.  Since applying this amount of fertilizer in pre-emerge will eliminate the 50 and 100 lb/ac N those treatments will become fertilizer N placement option treatments.  As in the past, N rate, placement and timing will be changed as deemed necessary to meet the goals of this study.

 

Figure 1.    Acres planted to corn and total bushels harvested from 1997-2009 in North Dakota.

 

 


Go to Strip-Till, corn on corn, Nitrogen Rate Study table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Strip-Till, Corn on Soybean, Nitrogen Rate Study

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Gardena loam, Embden loam and Embden sandy loam, soil‑P and soil-K was very high; soil-S was very low.

Previous crop:

2008 – soybean; 2007 – field corn; 2006 – soybean and edible bean.

Seedbed Preparation:

Strip-tilled on May 7, with a Orthman strip-till machine.

Hybrid:

Pioneer 9494 XR

Planting:

Planted Pioneer 9494 on May 12 @ 38,000 plants per acre in 30 inch rows.

Plots:

Plots were 37 ft long by 15 ft (6 rows) wide.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

May 7, during strip-till operation, banded 12 lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5 as 10-34-0, May 13 band applied 8 lbs N/acre and 17 lbs S/acre as 12-0-0-26.   May 13 band applied 30 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 on all plots except the zero N-rate plots,  June 10 applied N as 28-0-0 for a total of 100, 150 and 200 lbs total N/acre on the respective N-rate treatments (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 lbs N/acre).

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Lumax (3 pt/acre) on May 29 and Roundup (32 oz/acre) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 25.

Harvest:

Hand harvested November 3.  A ten-foot section from the two center rows from each plot (twenty feet of total row).

 


RESULTS

            Grain yield, chlorophyll meter readings, and grain protein increased with increased N rate.  Increasing N rates encouraged earlier silking dates suggesting N was limiting in all treatments prior to side-dress application.  In 2009 the pre-emerge N application was applied in a 10-inch band over the row to help prevent immobilization of N that was occurring in past year’s broadcast applications.  Although aggressive strip-tilling and banding the pre-emerge N application were positive steps to promote the growth of seedling and small corn plants in this no-till situation some additional steps are required.  To further facilitate optimum uptake of plant N prior to side-dress the total amount of fertilizer N applied pre-emerge will be upped to 75 lb/ac and applied with the strip-till operation and/or applied in a dribble band in 2010.  Side-dress applications of fertilizer N will be applied in-between every row instead of every other row as in the past.  Since applying this amount of fertilizer N pre-emerge will eliminate the 50 and 100 lb/ac N treatments, these plots will become a part of the fertilizer N placement treatments.  Interestingly in this no-till situation from 2007-2009 the check plots in the corn/soybean rotation have averaged 82 bu/ac compared to 75 bu/ac in the corn/corn check plots.  We are postulating that in this high residue irrigated system the 50 lb N/ac applied prior to side-dress has resulted in N stress (due to amount and placement) that becomes relieved sooner with the higher amount of N applied side-dress in the 200 lb N/ac treatment.  With the changes discussed earlier we believe the 150 lb/ac N rate should maximize yield. 

 

Go to Strip-Till, corn on soybean, Nitrogen Rate Study table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

Influence of Tillage in Onion

 

Establishing a uniform stand is critical in onion production.  The established stand must be of the correct population as this determines bulb size.  Irrigation is essential on sandy soils to maintain enough moisture for germination and seedling growth as the seed is planted shallow (0.5 to 0.75-inch deep).  The onion as very susceptible to wind erosion from the flag to three leaf stage.  To prevent the seedling from being cut off from blowing soil, producers use various cover crop schemes from planting in-between fall seeded winter wheat strips (using RTK guidance) to spring barley broadcast seeded prior to onion planting.  The trick with cover crops is to terminate the cover crop before it competes with the onions but not so soon as to allow the seedling to be cut off from blowing soil.  The objective of this study is to determine if onion stands can be established in spring strip-tilled small grain residue and eliminate the need for a cover crop.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Maddock sandy loam; soil N-32 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were high; soil-S was low.

Previous crops:

2008 – barley and wheat; 2007 – soybean; 2006 – field corn.

Seedbed preparation:

Conventional tillage was worked with a rototiller about six inches deep in May 4.

Strip-tilled April 24 utilizing a narrow shark toothed residue manager with an anhydrous point on the shank and 13-inch fluted closing coulters.  This configuration, with minimal angle (less aggressive) on the coulters, tilled a 6-inch non-bermed band in the soil.

Hybrid:

Bejo Seeds: Sedona

Planting:

Direct seeded onions (285,000 seeds/acre; later thinned to 180,000 plants/acre) on May 4 with a Monosem precision planter.  Onions were planted: 2 lines per row with 2.5 inches between lines and rows on 16-inch centers.

Plots:

Plots were 12 ft (eight rows) wide by 34 ft long.  The study had 4 reps.

Fertilizer:

Applied 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11‑16-20-8 on April 22.  Stream-bar applied 30 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 on June 2, June 22, July 6 and July 23.

Irrigation:

Sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Weeds were controlled using Select (8 oz/acre) + COC (1% v/v) and Buctril (4 oz/acre) on May 29; Goaltender (4 oz/acre) on June 9; Buctril (1 pt/acre) + Goal 2EC (0.6 oz/acre) on June 29, Select (8 oz/acre) + COC (1.0% v/v) on July 11 and hand weeding.

Harvest:

Hand harvested September 24.  Harvest area was 17 ft section from rows 2 and 3 and a 17 ft section from rows 5 and 6; east and west halves of each plot.  Onions were graded October 2 to October 6.

 

RESULTS

            To eliminate plant population as a variable, plots were over planted and thinned to the desired population of 180,000 plants/ac.  This population is considered at the high end for maximum bulb size in this region.  This is done to determine if bulb size can be maintained at a higher population.  Some yield risk is involved when producers shoot for a 135,000 to 150,000 population if environmental conditions reduce stands even 25%.  If bulb size isn’t significantly compromised at 180,000 plants/ac, this risk could be reduced.  In 2009, onion stands did not require thinning as the established stands for conventional-till and strip-till were 128,000 and 182,000 plant/ac.  Unfortunately we have no explanation for the stand reduction in the conventional till onions.  The reduced onion population in the conventional-till significantly reduced yield.  Increased bulb size in the reduced population showed up in only the greater than four-inch onions and that wasn’t significant.

 

Go to Strip-till vs conventional tillage in onion table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

           
Sugarbeet Hybrid-Tillage Study

 

            Sugarbeet stand establishment can be a difficult proposition.  Generally, dryland beets are planted into a well worked, firm, level seedbed to maintain accurate depth control and seed spacing into moist soil.  This results in a very smooth surface that is susceptible to wind erosion.  The emerging plants and seedlings are easily cut off by blowing soil.  Wind can cause the young seedlings to spin out of the ground, called helicoptering.  In either event, replanting is required.  The replanting is not only expensive but results in lost growing time which is important to maximize yield.  Strip-till is a procedure used by producers to protect the plants from wind.  Narrow black strips that match the row width of the planter are made in the fall on previous small grain or other suitable crop stubble.  The strips are made with a knife that works and lifts the soil.  Berm builders, coulters that contain the soil coming off the knife, make a berm.  Some strip-till machines used angled fluted coulters to till the strip and form a berm.  The widths of the black strips vary with the machine used but typically are about 6 inches wide.  The planter units plant on the tilled black strips from the previous fall.  The un-worked stubble in-between the strips acts as a wind buffer to protect the seedlings from wind damage. 

The objectives of this study are determine if viable sugarbeet stands can be established in strip-till zones and how beet yields compare between the conventional and strip-till.  Another objective is to show the advantages of irrigation to keep the small, shallow seeds moist during germination and seedling growth.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Maddock sandy loam; soil N-23 lbs/acre; soil-P was very high; soil-K was high; soil-S was low.

Previous crop:

2008 – barley; 2007 – soybean; 2006 – field corn.

Seedbed Preparation:

Strip-till: Strip-tilled April 24 utilizing a narrow shark toothed residue manager with an anhydrous point on the shank and 13-inch fluted closing coulters.  This configuration, with minimal angle (less aggressive) on the coulters, tilled a 6-inch non-bermed band in the soil.

Conventional: Rototilled May 5.

Planting:

Planted on May 6 in 22-inch rows at 120,000 seeds per acre and were later thinned to 47,500 plants per acre.

Plots:

Plots were 17 ft long by 7⅓ ft (4 rows) wide.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

April 22 broadcast 30 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 52 lbs K2O/acre and 22 lbs S/acre as 11-16-20-8.  Stream bar applied 30 lbs N/acre on June 2 and June 22 and 60 lbs N/acre on July 6 as 28-0-0.  This practice would not be recommended under field conditions as severe leaf burn could occur.  We were able to limit leaf burn by irrigating immediately after N application.

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Weeds were controlled with Select 2E (8 oz/acre) + COC (1.0% v/v) on May 29 and July 11; Progress (24 oz/acre) on May 30 (20 oz/acre) on June 9 and by hand weeding.  For disease control; Eminent (13 oz/acre) on July 22, August 5 and September 2; Headline (12 oz/acre) on July 29, August 19 and September 16.

Harvest:

Harvested on October 26.  Harvest area was 17 feet of the south three rows.  The beets were mechanically topped and lifted, then hand picked, counted, and weighed.  A sample from each plot was taken for analysis.

 

RESULTS

            The conventional-till treatment produced a higher total yield and recoverable sugar yield than the strip-till treatment. 

 

Go to Sugarbeet Hybrid Tillage Study table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

 

Optimum Corn Stover Removal for Biofuels and the Environment

 

The 2007 US energy bill calls for 36 billion gallons of ethanol to be produced by 2020.  In 2007 the US produced 6.5 billion gallons of ethanol.  A large expansion in ethanol production was predicted in 2008 with expansion of existing plants and new plants coming on line.  Estimates were as high as 13.3 billion gallons.  A financial crisis in the ethanol industry put many projects on hold and also caused some plants to close, resulting in a production of 9.2 billion gallons.  Despite these challenges about 10.7 billion bushels of ethanol were produced in 2009.  Figure 1 shows the historical increase in corn grain used for ethanol production from 2006-2009.

If corn grain was able to supply 15 billion gallons of ethanol, 21 billion gallons ethanol would have to come from cellulosic material (biomass) to meet the 2020 mandate. The production of 21 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol will require 350 million tons of dry biomass.  Presently, perennial grasses and corn stover are the most available.  About 194 million tons of biomass are produced in US production agriculture annually, with 75 million tons coming from corn stover.

Before we commit ourselves to using corn stover for fuel we need to study the environmental and economic consequences of this action.  What effect will stover removal have on soil organic matter, soil erosion and ultimately sustainability of the land resource? 

The objective of this study is to determine what rates of stover removal within different cropping systems are conducive to maintaining and possibly improving the productive capacity of the land will providing this Country with a renewable energy source. 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Soil:

Embden sandy loam, Hecla sandy loam and Maddock sandy loam;

Block 1:  soil-N 16 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was very low.

Block 2:  soil-N 14 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was low.

Block 3:  soil-N 14 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was low.

Previous crops:

Block 1:  2008 – field corn; 2007 – field corn; 2006 – soybean.

Block 2:  2008 – soybean; 2007 – field corn; 2006 – edible bean and soybean.

Block 3:  2008 – corn; 2007 – onion; 2006 – sunflower and edible bean.

Seedbed

preparation:

Strip-tilled on May 7, with a Orthman strip-till machine.

Hybrid:

Variety:

Corn:  Pioneer 38M60. 

Soybean:  Pioneer 90M80.

Planting:

Block 1:  Planted corn May 12 in 30-inch rows @ 38,000 seeds/acre.

Block 2:  Planted corn May 12 in 30-inch rows @ 38,000 seeds/acre.

Block 3:  Planted soybean May 13 in 30-inch rows @ 174,000 seeds/acre.

Fertilizer:

Block 1:  May 7, during strip-till operation, banded 12 lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5 as 10-34-0.  May 13, band applied 8 lbs N/acre and 17 lbs S/acre as 12-0-0-26   and 30 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0.  May 15, stream bar 60 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0.   June 10, sidedress 90 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0.

Block 2:  May 7, during strip-till operation, banded 12 lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5 as 10-34-0.  May 13 band applied 8 lbs N/acre and 17 lbs S/acre as 12-0-0-26   and 30 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0.  May 15, stream bar 60 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0. June 10, sidedress 69 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0.

Block 3: May 7, during strip-till operation, banded 12 lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5 as 10-34-0

Irrigation:

Hand move sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest

Control:

Block 1:  Apply Status (6 oz/acre) + Roundup (22 oz/acre) + NIS (0.25% v/v) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 3; Roundup (32 oz/acre) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 25;

Block 2:  Apply Buctril (1 pt/acre) + Atrazine (0.5 lb ai)/acre on May 21, Status (6 oz/acre) + Roundup (22 oz/acre) + NIS (0.25% v/v) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 3; Roundup (32 oz/acre) + AMS (10 lb/100 gal) on June 25;

Block 3:  Apply Extreme (2.5 pt/acre) + Roundup (16 oz/acre) + NIS (0.5 pt/100 gal) on June 11, Roundup 32 oz/acre + AMS 10 lb/100 gal July 10.  Apply Proline (5 oz/acre) on July 6 and July 15.  Apply Lorsban (2 pt/acre) on August 4.

Treatment

Corn stalks/residue was removed from Block I and Block III on April 28 according to the protocol (0%, 33%, 66% and 100% removal).

Harvest:

Block 1:  Hand harvest a 10 ft section of rows 4, 5, 8 and 9 from each plot on October 19, combined remainder November 17 with 4400 JD with a 4 row head and recorded with a weigh wagon (12 rows 27 feet long).

Block 2:  Hand harvest a 10 ft section of rows 4, 5, 8 and 9 from each plot on October 19, combined remainder November 17 with 4400 JD with a 4 row head and recorded with a weigh wagon (12 rows 27 feet long).

Block 3:  Harvest on September 30 with a 4400 JD combine with a straight cutter head (63 rows 106 feet long, harvested for the weigh wagon).

 

RESULTS

            Corn stover was removed at the 33, 67 and 100 percent removal rates in block I (corn/corn rotation - 2008) and block III (corn soybean rotation – 2008) on April 28, 2009.  The amount of residue removed in corn/corn plots for 33, 67, and 100% removal rates was 2.8, 4.0 and 6.3 tons/ac, respectively, compared to 2.4, 3.6 and 6.9 ton/ac in corn/onion2 plots. 

 

2Only onion ground was available in 2008.  In subsequent years corn will be planted on

  soybean ground.

 

RESULTS BLOCK III (Soybean/Corn)-2009

            All soybean plots were combine harvested and bulked.  The soybeans yielded 56.2 bu/ac at 13.0% moisture.  The test weight, grain protein, grain moisture, and seed weight were:  56.2 lb/bu, 33.0%, 12.4%, and 2,716 seeds/lb.


RESULTS BLOCK II (Corn/Soybean)-2009

            Sixteen hand harvested corn plots on the corn/soybean rotation averaged 215.2 bu/ac at 15.5% moisture.  Grain moisture, test weight and grain protein averaged: 32.0%, 50.4 lb/ac, and 7.5%, respectively.  For comparison the entire plot area was harvested with a combine and averaged: 225.6 bu/ac at 15.5% moisture and had a grain protein content of 7.62 %. This data indicates that hand harvested small plots don’t always out yield the whole area combine harvested. 

RESULTS BLOCK I (Corn/Corn)-2009

            Grain yield was not statistically affected by stover removal.  Grain moisture decreased, test weight increased, chlorophyll meter readings increased and grain protein content increased with increasing stalk removal.  Stalk nitrate-N was unaffected by stalk removal.  Increasing levels of residue tended to delay silking and maturity dates.  For comparison the entire plot area was harvested with a combine and averaged: 219.2 bu/ac at 15.5% moisture and had a grain protein content of 7.8 %.  As in Block II the entire combine harvested area yielded more than the 16 hand picked plots.

 

Figure 1.    Amount of corn grain used for ethanol production in the USA from 2006-2009.

 

Go to Optimum Corn Stover Removal for Biofuels and the Environment table

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page

 

FARM EXTENSION ACTIVITIES

 

Corn N Rate Studies in Producer Fields

W. Albus, L. Besemann and H. Eslinger

 

            The effect of fertilizer nitrogen-rate on yield and plant-soil nitrogen relationships was studied in eleven irrigated fields (fields w-g2), on two farms at Oakes, North Dakota, in 2009.  Producers compared conservative fertilizer N rates to N rates that would maximize yield. These rates were left up to their discretion.  These treatments were also tested for yield, in-season chlorophyll meter readings, end of season stalk nitrate-N tests, grain protein, oil and starch content, test weight and fall soil nitrate-N, Table 1.

 

RESULTS

            The conservative N rates chosen by producers with corn on corn tended to be about 30 to 40 lb/ac less than past research on producer’s farms indicated necessary for maximize economic yield (about 180lb N/ac), Table 2.  Nitrogen fertilizer rates of 150 lb/ac and less resulted in a $15 to $62 less income than higher rates. This would be expected as the higher rates ranged from 180 to 210 lb N/ac with a mean rate of 193 lb N/ac.  Stalk nitrate-N from 250 to 700 ppm is considered marginal.  This was apparent in this study as stalk nitrate-N contents below 500 ppm nitrate-N resulted reduce economic returns.  The economic return to fertilizer N in corn on potato ground was within $10/ac for a mean N rate of 176 lb N/ac rate compared to a mean N rate of 133 lb N/ac rate.  Stalk nitrate-N data supports this as stalk nitrate-N was 1,933 and 2,514 ppm at the 133 and 176 lb N/ac rates.

            The return to fertilizer N was similar from 177 to 247 lb N/ac in the data set from 2006 to 2009 for corn on corn.  Stalk nitrate-N was just in the sufficiency range at 1024 ppm at the 177 lb N/ac N rate and considerable above the sufficiency level at 207 lb N /ac.  Yield divided by maximum yield in fields averaged 99% at the 177 lb N/ac N rate.  Response to N rate in potato from 2006 to 2009 was unpredictable.  Stalk nitrate-N significantly exceeded that considered sufficient at all fertilizer N rates tested.  The data suggest that optimum fertilizer rates ranged from 147 to 181 lb N/ac. 

 

Go to Farm Extension Activities Tables

Go to beginning of material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page