Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension Center * North Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Phone: (701) 742-2744, FAX: (701) 742-2700, E-mail: Blaine.Schatz@ndsu.edu
Leonard.Besemann@ndsu.edu
Optimum Corn Stover Removal for Biofuels and the Environment
L. Besemann and H. Eslinger
        The 2007 U.S. energy bill calls for 36 billion gallons of ethanol to be produced by 2020.  In 2007 the U.S. produced 6.5 billion gallons of ethanol.  If corn grain was able to supply 15 billion gallons of ethanol, 21 billion gallons of ethanol would have to come from cellulosic material (biomass) to meet the 2020 mandate. The production of 21 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol will require 350 million tons of dry biomass.  Presently, perennial grasses and corn stover are the most available.  About 194 million tons of biomass is produced in U.S. production agriculture annually, with 75 million tons coming from corn stover.  Therefore corn stover is being looked at to play a major role in cellulosic ethanol production. 
        Before we commit ourselves to using corn stover for fuel we need to study the environmental and economic consequences of this action.  What effect will stover removal have on soil organic matter, soil erosion and ultimately sustainability of the land resource?  
        The objective of this study is to determine what rates of stover removal within different cropping systems are conducive to maintaining and possibly improving the productive capacity of the land while providing a renewable energy source.  
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Rotations: Block I: 2014 - field corn, 2013 – field corn, 2012 – field corn, 2011 - field corn, 2010 - field corn, 2009 ‑ field corn, 2008 – field corn, 2007 – field corn.
  Block II: 2014 - soybean, 2013 – field corn, 2012 – soybean, 2011 - field corn, 2010 - soybean, 2009 ‑ field corn, 2008 – soybean, 2007 – field corn.
  Block III: 2014 - field corn, 2013 – soybean, 2012 – field corn, 2011 - soybean, 2010 - field corn, 2009 – soybean, 2008 – field corn, 2007 - onion.
Soil: Embden sandy loam, Hecla sandy loam and Maddock sandy loam. 
  Block I:  pH=6.1; 2.1% organic matter; soil N 24 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K was very high; soil-S was very low.
  Block II: pH=6.0; 2.1% organic matter; soil N 32 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K was very high; soil-S was low. 
  Block III: pH=6.7; 1.1% organic matter; soil N 27 lbs/acre; soil-P and soil-K was very high; soil-S was low.
Seedbed preparation: Strip-till May 9 with an Orthman strip-till machine.
Hybrid: Corn:  Peterson 88A97SS RIB.  
Variety: Soybean:  Peterson 14R11 RR2Y.
Planting: Block I:  Corn May 10 in 30-inch rows @ 33,000 seeds/acre.
  Block II:  Soybean May 27 in 30-inch rows @ 205,000 seeds/acre.
  Block III:  Corn May 10 in 30-inch rows @ 33,000 seeds/acre.
Fertilizer: Block I:  Twelve lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5/acre as 10-34-0 via strip-till May 9.  Stream bar 10 lbs N/acre and 23 lbs S/acre as 12 0-0-26 and 60 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 May 22.  Sidedress 135 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 June 17.
  Block II:  Twelve lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5/acre as via strip-till May 9.  
  Block III:  Twelve lbs N/acre and 40 lbs P2O5/acre as via strip-till May 9.  Stream-bar 10 lbs/N acre and 23 lbs S/acre as 12-0-0-26 and 60 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 May 22.  Sidedress 135 lbs N/acre as 28-0-0 June 17.  
Irrigation: Hand move sprinkler irrigation as needed.
Pest control: Block I:  Harness (2 pt/acre) May 22, Laudis (3 oz/acre) + AAtrex 9-O (0.5 lb ai/acre) + Destiny (0.05%v/v) + AMS (1½ lbs/acre) June 3.
  Block II:  Roundup Power Max (30 oz/acre) + AMS (10 lbs/100 gal) June 7. Roundup Power Max (20 oz/acre) + AMS (1 lbs/10 gal) June 25.
  Block III:  Harness (2 pt/acre) May 22; Laudis (3 oz/acre) + AAtrex 9-0 (0.5 lb ai/acre) + Destiny (0.05% v/v) + AMS (1½ lbs/acre) June 3.
Remote sensing: Remote sensing was achieved with an Opti-Sciences CCM 200 Plus chlorophyll meter and a Holland Crop Circle ACS active canopy sensor (normalized difference red edge ‑ NDRE).
Harvest: Block I:  :  Hand harvested the entire length (27 feet) of rows 6 and 7 from each plot on October 17.
  Block II:  October 8 with a 4400 JD combine (48 rows 108 feet long, recorded with a weigh wagon).
  Block III:  Hand harvested the entire length (27 feet) of rows 6 and 7 from each plot on October 17.
RESULTS BLOCK I (Corn/Corn) - 2014
        Corn stover was removed at the 33, 67 and 100 percent removal rates in block I (corn/corn rotation).  Stover removal had no significant effect on grain yield, moisture and test weight at the 95% confidence level.  Stover removal had no effect on chlorophyll readings (Opti-Science CCM 200), Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) indice (Holland Crop Circle ACS 430) and stalk nitrate-N (Table 1) at the 95% confidence level.  Longer term data from 2009 to 2014 is presented in Table 2.  The effect on revenue for the higher yield of the 100 percent removal rate compared to the 0 percent removal rate when the cost of N, P and K are accounted for is shown in Figure 1.
RESULTS BLOCK II (Soybean/Corn) - 2014
       All soybean plots were combine harvested and bulked.  The soybeans yielded 51.0 bu/acre at 11.1% moisture (51.2 bu/acre @ 13 %) and had a test weight of 58.5 lbs/bu.
RESULTS BLOCK III (Corn/Soybean) - 2014
        Stover removal rates of 33, 67, and 100 had no effect on grain yield, moisture or test weight (Table 3).  
Figure 1.  The net return when the fertility cost leaving the field is subtracted from the yield advantage in 100 percent removal plots compared to 0 percent removal plots for corn on corn from 2008 to 2013 (Mean) at the Oakes Irrigation Research Site.
Table 1. The affect of corn stover removal from 0 to 100% on grain yield and other agronomic parameters for corn on corn plots in 2014.                  
Grain Stalk DM Chlorophyll  
Stover Grain Yield Harvest Test Stalk DM Removal Meter   Stalk Fall soil Seed Emerge Silk Mature Nutrients in stover2 Nutrient Value
Removal Yield1 2009-14 Moisture Weight Removal2 2008-13 Reading3 NDRE4 Population Nitrate-N Nitrate-N Oil Protein Starch Date Date Date N P K   20142 2008-2014
% bu/ac bu/ac % lb/bu ------ ton/ac ------ 4-Aug 4-Aug plants/ac ppm lbs ---------%------------ ---- lb/acre ---- ------ $/ac ------
0 191.9 216.1 16.5 51.9 0.0 0.0 51.5 0.3346 32831 1606 18 1.8 9.4 74.2 26-May 26-Jul 25-Sep 0 0 0 0 0
33 208.0 221.7 15.7 52.0 2.1 2.3 51.8 0.3462 34364 1896 36 1.7 9.1 74.5 25-May 24-Jul 24-Sep 26 2 29 24 38
67 204.3 223.3 16.2 52.2 2.8 3.5 53.2 0.3476 34284 1850 26 1.8 9.1 74.4 25-May 24-Jul 24-Sep 42 2 43 37 55
100 208.3 223.8 15.9 52.4 4.4 5.3 53.1 0.3461 33558 1603 57 1.7 9.2 74.6 25-May 23-Jul 24-Sep 60 3 86 62 79
                     
Mean 203.1 16.1 52.1 2.3 52.4 0.3436 33759 1738 34 1.8 9.2 74.4 25-May 24-Jul 24-Sep 32 2 40   31  
C.V. (%) 4.2 5.0 2.7 6.1 2.7 1.8 3.6 15.4 48.6 19.7 2.9 0.7 0 0 0 13.8 26.9 28.0 19.0
LSD 0.10 11.1 NS NS 0.18 NS 0.0078 NS NS 21.6 NS NS NS 0.65 1.5 NS 5.7 0.6 14 7.6
LSD 0.05 NS   NS NS 0.23   NS NS NS NS 26.6 NS NS NS 0.80 1.9 NS 7.0 0.8 18   9.4  
Planting Date = May 10; Harvest Date = October 17 ; Previous Crop = Corn.
Fertilizer Rate lbs/acre = 242 N, 40 P2O5,  23 S; Irrigation = 8.0 inches.
1 Yield adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
2 Corn stover removed spring of 2014 from 2013 corn crop.    
3Opti-Science CCM 200.
4Holland Crop Circle ACS active canopy sensor (normalized difference red edge) - NDRE.
Table 2.  Corn on Corn Stover Removal - NDSU Oakes Irrigation Research site 2009-2014.
Stover Grain Harvest  Test Chlorophyll Reading Stalk Grain Silk Mature
Removal Yield Moisture Weight Reading NDRE Nitrate-N Protein Date Date
% bu/ac % lb/bu   ppm %
 
0 216.1 21.7 54.0 54.0 0.3605 2434 8.6 7/24 9/29
33 221.7 20.9 54.6 55.1 0.3624 2931 8.5 7/23 9/28
67 223.3 20.9 54.6 56.1 0.3636 2920 8.5 7/22 9/27
100 223.8 20.3 54.9 56.1 0.3594 3143 8.6 7/21 9/27
                   
Mean 221.2                
Table 3. The affect of corn stover removal from 0 to 100% on grain yield and other agronomic parameters for corn on soybean plots in 2014.
Previous
Year Grain
Stover Grain Yield Harvest Test Nitrate-N Seed Emerge Silk Mature
Removal Yield1 2009-14 Moisture Weight Chlorophyll2 NDRE3 Stalk test Fall Soil  Population Oil Protein Starch Date Date Date
% bu/ac % lb/bu 4-Aug 4-Aug ppm lbs plants/ac ------------%-------------
0 220.5 227.2 15.7 53.2 52.7 0.3535 1800 42 32670 2.2 9.3 73.7 25-May 23-Jul 24-Sep
33 221.3 222.4 15.6 53.4 52.1 0.3532 1428 73 33315 2.0 9.2 74.1 25-May 22-Jul 24-Sep  
67 205.4 222.2 15.1 53.1 48.8 0.3481 1156 29 33073 2.1 9.2 73.9 25-May 22-Jul 24-Sep
100 222.4 225.7 15.4 53.5 54.3 0.3536 1628 89 33719 1.9 9.3 74.2 25-May 22-Jul 24-Sep
Mean 217.4   15.5 53.3 51.9 0.4 1503 58 33194 2.1 9.2 74.0 25-May 22-Jul 24-Sep
C.V. (%) 5.2 5.3 1.2 5.9 1.8 45.5 56.6 2.5 11.0 2.7 0.6 0 0 0
LSD 0.10 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
LSD 0.05 NS   NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Planting Date = May 10; Harvest Date = October 17 ; Previous Crop = Soybean
Fertilizer Rate lbs/acre = 242 N, 40 P2O5,  23 S; Irrigation = 8.0 inches.
1 Yield adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
2Opti-Science CCM 200.
3Holland Crop Circle ACS active canopy sensor (normalized difference red edge) - NDRE.
Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Variety trials Crop index Home page Report 2014
Other corn Studies 2014
Corn hybrid performance trial - dryland
Corn hybrid performance trial - irrigated
Strip-till continuous corn N-rate
Strip-till corn/soybean rotation corn N-rate