Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension CenterNorth Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Voice: (701) 742-2744, FAX: (701) 742-2700, E-mail: Walter.Albus@ndsu.edu

 

SUGAR BEET VARIETY PERFORMANCE TRIAL

W. Albus, L. Besemann and H. Eslinger

 

Results summary

Table 1.  Results of the sugar beet variety performance trial.

 

           Although sugarbeets are primarily a dryland crop in the Red River Valley several thousand acres are irrigated in eastern ND and western Minnesota.  About another 15,000 acres are grown under irrigation in northwestern ND.  Top producing varieties under dryland production may or may not be the best varieties under irrigation.  As quality is very important in the processing of sugarbeets it becomes important to test these parameters in an irrigated environment.  The objective of this trial was to evaluate irrigated sugar beets for yield and quality characteristics.  We would like to thank American Crystal Sugar Company for their support.  A special thanks goes to Dr. Allan Cattanach, agronomist with American Crystal for his advice in growing the crop.  We would also like to thank the NDSU sugarbeet crew for their help during harvest. 

                                                                      

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

 

Soil:

Embden loam and Gardena loam; pH=6.8; 2.5% organic matter; soil-P and soil-K was very high; soil-S was high.

Previous crop:

2006 – cabbage and soybean; 2005 – cabbage; 2004 – field corn.

Seedbed Preparation:

Disk and multiweed (field cultivate) on April 25.

Planting:

Planted on April 26 in 22-inch rows at 120,000 seeds per acre and were later thinned to 47,500 plants per acre.

Plots:

Plots were 17 ft long by 7⅓ ft (4 rows) wide.  There were four reps.

Fertilizer:

November 2006, broadcast 9 lbs N/acre, 43 lbs P2O5/acre, 101 lbs K2O/acre and 13.5 lbs S/acre as 11-52-0, 0-0-60 and 90% elemental sulfur.  Apply 30 lbs N/acre on June 6 and 90 lbs N/acre on June 19 as 32-0-0. 

Irrigation:

Overhead sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Weeds were controlled with Nortron (4 oz/acre) + Progress (6 oz/acre) on May 9, Select 2E (8 oz/acre) + NIS (0.05% v/v) on June 5), rototilling and by hand weeding.  For disease control; Eminent (13 oz/acre) on July 11 and August 3, Proline (5 oz/acre) on July 21, and Headline (12 oz/acre) on August 16 and August 31.

Harvest:

Harvested on October 22.  Harvest area was 17 feet of the center two rows.  The beets were mechanically topped and lifted and then hand picked counted and weighed.  A sample from each plot was taken for analysis.

 

RESULTS

 

           Stand establishment, as shown by final stands, ranged from 39,316 to 48,228 plants/acre.  Yields ranged from 36.4 to 43.8 ton/acre.  Crystal 820 had the highest sugar % and highest recoverable sugar/ton (RST).  The highest recoverable sugar/acre (RSA) was recorded with SDX Alpine due to its higher overall yield  Sugar percent was good and sugar lost to molasses was low.  Impurities in the beets; sodium, potassium and amino-N were low.  Fall 2006 soil tests showed 27 lb/acre of nitrate-N at the 0-24’ depth compared to 21 lb/acre in the fall 2007 soil test.  Sugarbeets were grown with a 165 lb/acre of fertilizer plus soil N in this sandy loam soil with an organic matter content of 2.5 %.

 

Go to top of sugarbeet variety performance trial

 

Table 1.  Results of the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2007 sugar beet variety trial.

Variety

Yield

Sugar

Sugar

Recoverable

Sodium

Potassium

Amino

Stand

 loss

Sugar

Sugar

 

ton/acre

----------- % ------------

lb/ton

lb/acre

---------------------- ppm --------------------

plants/acre

 

Crystal 434

40.3

17.8

1.3

329

13276

106

2012

432

45607

Crystal 727

36.4

18.6

1.2

349

12662

81

1908

377

39316

Crystal 820

38.7

18.6

1.0

353

13615

90

1743

286

39491

HH 317

39.2

17.8

1.0

336

13161

83

1749

312

41763

SDX Alpine

43.8

17.1

1.2

318

13927

74

2022

345

48228

VDH 46519

43.2

17.2

1.1

322

13869

74

1921

283

42811

 

MEAN

40.3

17.8

1.1

334

13418

84

1892

339

42869

C.V. (%)

5.0

2

7.6

2

5

15

5

13

9

LSD (0.05)

3.0

0.5

0.1

13

964

19

134

65

5624

 

Go to top of sugarbeet variety performance trial

 

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site Variety Performance Trials

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site crop index

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2007 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page