Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension Center * North Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Voice: (701) 742-2189, FAX: (701) 742-2700, E-mail: Leonard.Besemann@ndsu.edu

 PREEMERGENCE WEED CONTROL IN ONION, 2005

Carrie Schumacher and Harlene Hatterman-Valenti

North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Richard Greenland, Oakes Irrigation Research Site


Results summary

Table 59. Effect of preemergence herbicide on weed control and plant stand

Table 60. Effect of preemergence herbicide on onion yield and grade



Objective: Field research was conducted at Oakes, ND, in 2005 to compare early weed control with bromoxynil, DCPA, dimethenamid-P and pendimethalin (aqueous capsule formulation) in onion (Allium cepa L.) and to evaluate the injury caused by these herbicides on onion.

 

Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Oakes Irrigation Research Site, Oakes, ND. Onion variety ‘Varsity’ pelleted seed was planted on April 18. Herbicides were applied at a low, medium or high rate. The middle rate was the labeled rate. The high rate was double, and the low rate was half, the middle rate. Treatments were applied directly after planting, except bromoxynil which was applied 10 days after planting. Herbicides were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer delivering 20 gal/acre at 30 psi through 11002 nozzles. Plots were 6 ft wide and 17 ft long. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Weed coverage and control, and onion height and injury were evaluated two, four and eight wks after application. At the fifth leaf stage, a standard application of bromoxynil and oxyfluorfen (0.375 and 0.125 lb ai/acre) in 18.5 gal/acre was made to all plots, except checks. Pendimethalin at a rate of 0.62 lb ai/acre in 18.5 gal/acre was also applied at the fifth leaf stage as a final late season weed control measure. A final weed control evaluation was made one week before harvest. On October 4, 10 feet of the middle two rows of each plot were harvested for grade and yield analysis. After harvest, onions were allowed to cure and then were graded. Split, diseased and double bulbs were graded as culls regardless of diameter.


Results: Dimethenamid-P applied at the high rate severely reduced plant stand. DCPA, dimethenamid-P and pendimethalin at the middle and high rates had good weed control. Bromoxynil at all rates had poor weed control. At the end of the season there was a severe decline in weed control due to intense weed pressure. No treatment yielded as good as the hand-weeded check (441.5 cwt/acre). Of the treatments, DCPA at the middle rate had the highest yield (231.6 cwt/acre) followed by pendimethalin at the middle rate (177.8 cwt/acre) and dimethenamid–P at the low rate (169.8 cwt/acre).


Go to top of preemergence weed control in onion


Table 59. Effect of preemergence herbicide on weed control and plant stand (6 ft of row).


Herbicide


Rate

Plant Stand

11WAT1

Weed Control2

8WAT

1WBH

 

lbs ai/acre

plants/6 ft of row

----------------------- % ----------------------

 

Pendimethalin

0.475

8.1 a-d4

  68 c

  15 bc

Pendimethalin

0.95

7.0 bcd

  85 ab

  28 b

Pendimethalin

1.9

7.0 bcd

  95 a

  18 bc

DCPA

3.38

10.4 a

  71 bc

  18 bc

DCPA

6.75

9.8 ab

  84 abc

  23 bc

DCPA

13.5

8.1 a-d

  96 a

  18 bc

Bromoxynil3

0.156

7.8 a-d

  15 d

    0 c

Bromoxynil

0.312

7.4 a-d

  15 d

  20 bc

Bromoxynil

0.625

7.9 a-d

  10 d

  10 bc

Dimethenamid-P

0.28

7.1 bcd

  73 bc

  28 b

Dimethenamid -P

0.56

5.4 cde

  85 ab

  25 b

Dimethenamid-P

1.13

3.5 e

  93 a

  28 a

Weedy check

   -

6.3 cde

    0 d

    0 c

Hand-weeded check

   -

8.8 abc

100 a

100 a

1Abbreviations: WAT, weeks after treatment; WBH, week before harvest.

2Average control of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, hairy nightshade, and purslane.

3Applied as a delayed preemergence 10 days after planting.

4Means followed by the same letter within each column are not significantly different using Fisher’s protected LSD test at P≤ 0.05.


Go to top of preemergence weed control in onion


Table 60. Effect of preemergence herbicide on onion yield and grade.


Herbicide


Rate

Yield (by onion diameter in inches)

1 to 2 1/4

2 1/4 to3

>3

Total

 

lb ai/acre

----------------------------- cwt/acre -----------------------------

 

Pendimethalin

0.475

49.2 ab2

75.3 bcd

30.5 bcd

155.4 bcd

Pendimethalin

0.95

45.9 ab

85.4 bc

46.5 bcd

177.8 bc

Pendimethalin

1.9

52.4 ab

45.9 cde

13.4 cd

111.5 cd

DCPA

3.38

57.6 ab

70.0 bcd

27.8 cd

156.5 bcd

DCPA

6.75

46.5 ab

103.1 b

82.2 b

231.6 b

DCPA

13.5

51.3 ab

68.4 bcd

18.1 cd

138.8 bcd

Bromoxynil1

0.156

59.3 a

32.0 de

5.9 cd

97.2 cde

Bromoxynil

0.312

44.4 ab

66.7 bcd

13.9 cd

124.9 cd

Bromoxynil

0.625

49.6 ab

62.5 bcd

25.1 cd

137.2 bcd

Dimethenamid-P

0.28

49.6 ab

64.1 bcd

56.1 bc

169.8 bc

Dimethenamid -P

0.56

34.7 bc

49.6 cde

26.1 cd

110.5 cd

Dimethenamid-P

1.13

14.5 cd

34.7 de

18.7 cd

67.8 de

Weedy check

  -

0.0 d

0.0 e

0.0 d

0.0 e

Hand-weeded check

  -

36.4 abc

155.9 a

249.3 a

441.5 a

1Applied as a delayed preemergence 10 days after planting.

2Means followed by the same letter within each column are not significantly different using Fisher’s protected LSD test at P≤ 0.05.


Go to top of preemergence weed control in onion


Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site Variety Performance Trials

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site crop index

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2005 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page