Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension Center * North Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Voice: (701) 742-2189, FAX: (701) 742-2700, email: rgreenla@ndsuext.nodak.edu

 

 

CARROT WEED CONTROL STUDY

Richard Greenland


Results summary

Table 55. Treatment application data

Table 56. Carrot root characteristics

Table 57. Crop injury by herbicides

Table 58. Hairy nightshade, eastern black nightshade, and purslane control by herbicides

Table 59. Number of roots and yield of carrots


           Only a few herbicides are available for weed control in carrots. Treflan, Lorox, Poast and Fusilade are the most commonly used. In this study we evaluated several new herbicides and herbicide combinations for use in carrots.


MATERIALS AND METHODS


Soil:

Hecla sandy loam and Embden sandy loam; pH=7.1; 2.5% organic matter; soil-P was very high; soil-K was medium; soil-S was low.

Previous crop:

2003 - potato; 2002 - cabbage, carrot, edible bean, field corn, onion, potato, soybean, sugar beet, sweetcorn and wheat; 2001 - field corn.

Seedbed

Preparation:

Disked on April 2 and on May 26. Multiweeded (field cultivated) three times on May 27 -- once to smooth the seedbed and incorporate the fertilizer, and twice to incorporate herbicides.

Planting:

Direct seeded ‘Niagra’ carrots on May 27 with a Monosem precision vacuum planter set to plant a row of barley cover crop between and parallel to the carrot rows. Carrot planting pattern was 3 lines per row (2 inches between lines in the row) with rows on 18-inch centers. Planting rate was about 800,000 seeds/acre for carrot and 0.45 bu/acre for barley.

Plots:

Plots were 17 ft long by 6 ft wide with a 2-ft border between plots. There were 4 reps.

Fertilizer:

On April 15 broadcast 20 lbs N/acre and 24 lbs S/acre as 20-0-0-24. Applied 50 lbs N/acre on May 27 and 60 lbs N/acre on July 15 as 28-0-0

Irrigation:

Surface drip irrigation as needed.

Pest

control:

Treflan (1.5 pt/acre preplant incorporated on May 27) and Fusilade + NIS (12 oz/acre + 0.5% v/v on June 19) were applied to all plots. Check plots were hand weeded. See Table 57 for other weed control treatments. Sprayed Baythroid (2.8 oz/acre on August 2, August 12 and August 19) to control leafhopper.

Harvest:

Carrots were harvested September 16 to September 20. Harvest area was a 3-ft section from the center two rows from each plot.


RESULTS


           Surpass reduced carrot stand and slightly injured carrots when applied PRE or at the high (1.5 pt) rate when applied PPI. It gave good control of nightshade early but lost its effectiveness as the season progressed. Surpass reduced carrot number, yield, length, and size. Valor reduced carrot stand, especially at the 1 oz rate applied PRE. It gave poor to fair control of hairy nightshade. The reduced stand and failure to control nightshade resulted in carrot number and yield reductions. Balance Pro applied POST2 or POST3 did not injure carrots or reduce carrot stand. But it did not control nightshade either, causing reduction of carrot yield, size, and length. Callisto yellowed, bleached and burned the carrot leaves when applied postemergence, which reduced carrot yield. It gave excellent control of nightshade. Authority caused minor injury to carrots but they recovered quickly. It only gave fair to poor control of nightshade, resulting in reduced carrot yield and root size. Lorox did not injure carrot. It did not control nightshade when applied only PRE, but it gave excellent nightshade control when applied both PRE and POST. Dacthal, in combination with Lorox, also controlled nightshade. Lorox applied both PRE and POST, and the Lorox/Dacthal combinations gave the highest carrot numbers, yield, and root size. None of the new herbicides performed as well as the standards.


Go to top of carrot weed control study


Table 55. Treatment application data for the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2004 carrot weed control study.

Application

timing

Date

Time

Barley

height

Carrot

height

Carrot

growth stage

Weed

height

Weed

growth stage

 

PPI

May 27

10:55 am

0

0

0

0

0

PRE

May 27

4:40 pm

0

0

0

0

0

POST1

June 10

9:55 am

2"

0

0

¼”

cot to 2 lf

POST2

June 30

10:30 am

4"(dying)

3"

3 lf

1 to 6"

4 to 10 lf

POST3

July 9

2:25 pm

6"

5 lf

up to 12"

begin bloom

Treatments were applied with a CO2 pressurized backpack sprayer using AI 110-04 flat fan nozzles, 45 gpa, at 57 psi. Weed ratings were taken on June 29, July 14, August 3.

Treflan (1.5 pt/acre on May 27) and Fusilade + NIS (12 oz/acre + 0.5% v/v on June 17) were applied to entire study.


Go to top of carrot weed control study


Table 56. Carrot root characteristics for the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2004 carrot weed control study.

Treatment

number1

Average

root length

Average

root size

Multiple

root

US #1

yield

Uniformity

Overall

score

 

inches

oz/root

---------- % ---------

1 to 5

1 to 10

 

1

5.6 hi2

2.7 def

26 b-f

62

2.4 a-d

6.4 a-e

2

5.6 hi

3.5 def

30 def

57

2.3 b-e

6.1 cde

3

6.0 f-i

4.2 c-f

34 ef

62

2.4 a-d

6.5 a-e

4

5.8 hi

4.4 cde

27 b-f

70

2.3 b-e

6.1 cde

5

5.8 hi

2.4 ef

11 abc

63

2.4 a-d

6.3 b-e

6

6.3 d-h

2.1 ef

  0 a

79

2.4 a-d

6.1 cde

7

6.1 f-i

3.2 def

10 ab

83

2.0 de

6.0 ef

8

6.5 c-h

7.7 ab

45 f

45

1.9 e

5.6 f

9

7.1 a-e

8.2 a

32 def

65

2.4 a-d

6.4 a-e

10

7.2 a-d

7.6 ab

28 b-f

69

2.6 ab

6.5 a-d

11

7.6 ab

6.5 abc

28 b-f

66

2.9 a

6.6 abc

12

6.8 a-g

4.0 c-f

19 a-e

70

2.6 ab

6.5 a-d

13

6.9 a-f

5.2 cd

22 b-e

71

2.6 ab

6.6 ab

14

6.2 e-h

4.1 c-f

20 a-e

73

2.5 abc

6.4 a-e

15

7.4 abc

6.4 abc

29 c-f

64

2.5 abc

6.4 a-e

16

6.6 b-h

4.0 c-f

17 a-e

72

2.4 a-d

6.5 a-e

17

6.3 d-h

3.9 def

17 a-e

61

2.1 cde

6.4 a-e

18

6.0 f-i

3.6 def

24 b-e

63

2.4 a-d

6.4 a-e

19

5.9 ghi

3.0 def

22 b-e

72

2.5 abc

6.5 a-d

20

5.2 i

1.8 f

12 a-d

72

2.0 de

6.0 def

21

6.9 a-f

4.9 cd

25 b-e

68

2.6 ab

6.6 ab

22

7.7 a

5.3 bcd

24 b-e

74

2.8 a

6.8 a

 

Probability

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.04

0.13

0.006

0.009

C.V. (%)

11

36

58

19

13

5

1See Table 57 for weed control treatments.

2Values in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05

  level. No significant differences between values in column without letters.


Go to top of carrot weed control study


Table 57. Crop injury by herbicides in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2004 carrot weed control study.

Treat-

ment

no.

Herbicide(s)

Application

Rate

Application

timing1

Crop Injury

Stand rating

June 29

July 14

Aug 3

June 29

July 14

 

------------------------------ 0 to 102 ------------------------------

 

1

Surpass

1 pt

PPI

1.5 d3

0.3 ab

0.0 a

6.8 abc

7.5 abc

2

Surpass

1.5 pt

PPI

2.5 e

1.3 cd

0.0 a

5.8 cd

6.8 cde

3

Surpass

1 pt

PRE

3.3 e

2.8 e

0.0 a

3.0 e

5.0 gh

4

Surpass

1.5 pt

PRE

3.3 e

1.5 cd

0.0 a

3.5 e

4.8 h

5

Lorox

1 lb

PRE

0.8 a-d

0.0 a

0.0 a

7.3 ab

7.8 ab

6

Lorox

1.5 lbs

PRE

0.8 a-d

0.0 a

0.0 a

7.3 ab

7.5 abc

7

Valor

0.5 oz

PRE

0.3 ab

0.3 ab

0.0 a

5.0 d

5.8 fg

8

Valor

1 oz

PRE

0.8 a-d

0.3 ab

0.0 a

3.8 e

4.3 h

9

Lorox + Dacthal

1 lb + 8 lbs

PRE + POST1

1.3 cd

0.0 a

0.0 a

7.0 ab

7.5 abc

10

Dacthal + Lorox

8 lbs + 1 lb

POST1 + POST2

0.5 abc

0.0 a

0.0 a

7.3 ab

7.8 ab

11

Lorox + Lorox

1 lb + 1.5 lbs

PRE + POST2

0.6 a-d

0.0 a

0.0 a

8.0 a

8.3 a

12

Lorox + Authority

1 lb + 2 oz

PRE + POST2

0.8 a-d

1.3 cd

0.0 a

6.3 bc

6.5 def

13

Lorox + Valor

1 lb + 2 oz

PRE + POST2

0.3 ab

4.0 f

0.0 a

7.3 ab

6.5 def

14

Lorox + Balance Pro

1 lb + 1 oz

PRE + POST2

0.0 a

2.8 e

0.0 a

7.0 ab

7.3 bcd

15

Lorox + Callisto

1 lb + 3 oz

PRE + POST2

0.5 abc

5.8 g

2.8 c

7.5 a

6.3 ef

16

Valor + Valor

0.5 oz + 1.5 oz

PRE + POST3

1.0 a-d

2.7 e

0.3 ab

8.1 a

7.6 abc

17

Valor + Authority

0.5 oz + 2 oz

PRE + POST3

0.8 a-d

2.8 e

0.0 a

6.8 abc

7.3 bcd

18

Lorox + Authority

1 lb + 2 oz

PRE + POST3

0.5 abc

2.5 e

0.0 a

7.8 a

8.3 a

19

Lorox + Valor

1 lb + 2 oz

PRE + POST3

0.3 ab

2.8 e

0.8 b

7.3 ab

7.3 bcd

20

Lorox + Balance Pro

1 lb + 1 oz

PRE + POST3

1.0 bcd

2.0 de

0.0 a

7.0 ab

7.8 ab

21

Lorox + Callisto

1 lb + 3 oz

PRE + POST3

0.8 a-d

2.5 e

3.8 d

8.0 a

8.3 a

22

Hand weeded check

0.8 a-d

1.0 bc

0.8 b

8.0 a

7.8 ab

 

Probability

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

C.V. (%)

68

37

103

13

10

1See Table 55 for explanation of application timings.

2Crop injury ratings are from 0 to 10: 0 = no crop injury, 10 = all carrots dead. For stand ratings: 0 = no plants, 10 = perfect stand.

3Values in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.


Go to top of carrot weed control study


Table 58. Hairy nightshade, eastern black nightshade, and purslane control by herbicides in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2004 carrot weed control study.

Treatment

number1

Hairy nightshade

Eastern black nightshade

Common purslane

June 29

July 14

Aug 3

June 29

July 14

Aug 3

June 29

July 14

Aug 3

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 to 102 ------------------------------------------------------------------

 

1

7.5 bcd3

6.3 e-h

4.0 def

8.8 a-e

8.0 def

5.8 h

9.5

9.5 ab

10.0 a

2

7.8 a-d

6.0 f-i

3.3 def

9.5 ab

9.3 abc

8.3 b-f

9.5

9.3 b

9.8 a

3

8.3 abc

7.0 d-g

4.8 cd

9.8 a

9.0 a-d

7.5 d-g

9.8

9.3 b

9.5 a

4

8.3 abc

7.3 c-g

3.8 def

9.8 a

9.3 abc

8.5 a-f

10.0

9.8 ab

9.8 a

5

6.3 cde

4.3 hi

3.5 def

7.8 ef

8.0 def

6.3 gh

10.0

9.8 ab

10.0 a

6

6.3 cde

4.5 hi

3.0 def

8.8 a-e

7.8 ef

7.5 d-g

9.8

10.0 a

10.0 a

7

6.0 de

4.0 i

1.8 f

9.0 a-d

8.5 cde

8.3 b-f

9.8

9.8 ab

10.0 a

8

8.5 ab

7.0 d-g

5.3 cd

9.3 abc

8.8 b-e

7.3 e-h

9.8

9.8 ab

9.5 a

9

9.8 a

9.8 a

9.3 ab

9.8 a

9.5 abc

8.8 a-e

10.0

10.0 a

10.0 a

10

9.8 a

10.0 a

10.0 a

9.8 a

10.0 a

10.0 a

10.0

10.0 a

10.0 a

11

6.9 b-e

9.8 ab

9.2 ab

7.9 def

9.9 ab

9.3 abc

10.0

10.0 a

10.0 a

12

6.5 b-e

7.5 b-g

4.5 de

8.0 def

9.5 abc

7.0 fgh

9.5

9.3 b

9.5 a

13

6.0 de

9.3 abc

8.5 ab

8.5 b-f

10.0 a

9.8 ab

9.8

10.0 a

9.5 a

14

7.3 b-e

7.5 b-g

4.5 de

8.5 b-f

9.0 a-d

7.5 d-g

9.3

10.0 a

10.0 a

15

7.0 b-e

10.0 a

9.8 a

8.8 a-e

10.0 a

10.0 a

9.5

8.5 c

5.5 c

16

6.1 de

8.4 a-e

5.0 cd

8.2 c-f

9.6 abc

9.2 abc

9.4

10.0 a

10.0 a

17

6.3 cde

7.0 d-g

5.0 cd

8.8 a-e

9.8 ab

7.8 c-g

10.0

9.8 ab

9.5 a

18

6.8 b-e

8.0 a-f

4.3 de

8.0 def

9.8 ab

7.3 e-h

9.3

9.5 ab

10.0 a

19

8.0 a-d

8.5 a-d

7.0 bc

8.0 def

9.5 abc

9.0 a-d

9.5

10.0 a

10.0 a

20

5.3 e

4.8 hi

2.3 ef

8.5 b-f

7.0 f

8.5 a-f

10.0

10.0 a

10.0 a

21

6.3 cde

5.8 ghi

10.0 a

8.3 c-f

8.5 cde

9.8 ab

9.8

10.0 a

7.8 b

22

5.3 e

6.0 f-i

10.0 a

7.5 f

7.8 ef

9.8 ab

9.0

10.0 a

10.0 a

 

Probability

0.0002

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.0008

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.16

0.0004

<0.0001

C.V. (%)

20

21

29

10

9

13

5

5

7

1See Table 57 for weed control treatments.

2Ratings are from 0 to 10: 0 = no weed control, 10 = complete weed control.

3Values in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level. No significant differences

  between values in column without letters.


Go to top of carrot weed control study


Table 59. Number of roots and yield of carrots in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2004 carrot weed control study.

Treatment

 number1

Number of carrot roots (by carrot diameter)

Carrot yield (by carrot diameter)

>1.5"

1 to 1.5"

US #1

total

>1.5"

1 to 1.5"

US #1

total

 

------------------------ 1000s/acre ----------------------------

---------------------------- tons/acre ---------------------------

 

1

  27 g-j2

53 abc

100 b-g

182 a-e

3.6 hij

3.5 a-f

8.1 e-h

13.4 d-h

2

  36 e-i

27 c-g

  64 e-h

156 b-f

6.0 e-j

1.8 d-h

7.8 e-h

13.8 e-g

3

  33 e-j

19 d-g

  54 f-i

  90 gj

6.1 d-j

1.1 e-h

7.3 fgh

11.8 fgh

4

  34 f-i

19 efg

  53 ghi

  91 hi

6.0 d-j

1.3 e-h

7.3 fgh

11.1 fgh

5

  25 g-j

29 c-g

  77 d-h

144 d-h

4.2 g-j

2.0 c-h

7.1 fgh

9.6 fgh

6

  17 hij

77 a

112 b-e

196 a-d

2.5 hij

4.5 ab

7.5 e-h

9.4 fgh

7

  17 ij

23 c-g

  42 hi

  64 ij

2.8 hij

1.6 e-h

4.5 gh

6.3 gh

8

    8 ij

  2 g

  11 i

  30 j

2.4 ij

0.2 h

2.5 h

7.9 fgh

9

  92 abc

10 fg

107 b-f

174 b-e

25.6 b

1.1 fgh

26.7 b

41.9 ab

10

122 a

24 c-g

148 ab

213 ab

32.4 a

2.2 b-h

34.6 a

50.6 a

11

102 ab

38 b-f

148 ab

212 abc

27.0 ab

3.0 a-g

30.3 ab

44.8 ab

12

  28 g-j

50 a-d

  97 b-g

140 d-h

5.7 f-j

4.1 abc

10.5 c-g

15.2 d-g

13

  58 d-f

36 b-f

102 b-f

151 c-g

12.6 cd

2.8 b-g

15.6 cd

22.1 cde

14

  47 d-h

33 c-f

  85 d-h

137 d-h

8.7 d-h

2.7 b-g

11.5 c-f

15.3 def

15

  63 c-f

21 efg

  85 d-h

129 e-h

15.8 c

1.2 gh

17.0 c

26.3 c

16

  67 cde

66 ab

137 abc

211 abc

11.9 c-f

5.3 a

17.3 c

23.8 cd

17

  36 e-i

46 b-e

  86 c-h

142 d-h

6.5 e-i

3.6 a-e

10.2 d-g

15.5 def

18

  69 bcd

55 abc

129 a-d

211 abc

10.3 c-g

4.1 a-d

14.7 cde

23.2 cde

19

  33 e-j

46 a-e

117 bcd

159 b-f

5.6 e-j

3.7 a-e

11.0 c-g

15.1 d-g

20

    2 j

44 b-e

  59 fgh

104 f-i

0.2 j

2.6 b-g

3.2 h

4.5 h

21

  54 d-g

33 c-f

  99 b-g

151 c-g

12.1 cde

2.5 b-g

14.9 cd

21.9 cde

22

117 a

44 a-e

177 a

246 a

25.8 b

3.7 a-e

29.9 ab

39.9 b

 

Probability

<0.0001

0.002

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.004

<0.0001

<0.0001

C.V. (%)

44

57

37

27

42

59

34

32

1See Table 57 for weed control treatments.

2Values in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.


Go to top of carrot weed control study

 

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site Weed Control Studies page

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site crop index

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2004 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page