Oakes Irrigation Research
Site
Carrington Research Extension Center * North Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Voice: (701) 742-2189, FAX: (701)
742-2700, email: rgreenla@ndsuext.nodak.edu
EFFECTS OF PREVIOUS CROPS ON POTATO
Richard Greenland
Table 55. Previous crop management treatments
Table 56. 2002 spring soil N tests and fall disease ratings
Table 57. 2002 spring soil organic matter and pH, and fall potato yield and quality
INTRODUCTION
To reduce disease problems and maintain potato quality, potato should be planted in a field only once every three or four years. The crops grown the other two or three years can affect the yield and quality of potatoes and the economic viability of the farming system. Presently, farmers earn money the year they plant potato (or rent their land for potato production), then have two or three lean years until they can plant potato again. This tempts many to shorten the rotation interval, resulting in increased possibility of crop failure, or yield and quality reduction when they do plant potato. Producers are requesting information concerning rotations involving potato. One alternative is to grow vegetables such as carrot, cabbage, onion, or sweetcorn in rotation with potato. These are high value crops that require irrigation and could increase farmer income substantially in years when potato is not grown. However, little information is available on the effects of vegetable crops planted in rotation with potato. Research indicates that some crops in the brassica family (of which cabbage is a member) reduce disease in potato planted the following year. Carrots may increase deleterious nematode numbers in some areas but may not be a problem in North Dakota. Standard rotations involving potato need to be developed. Given 10 crops with three or four year rotations, there are almost a thousand different rotations possible that include potato. By determining which crops potato does well or poorly after, the number of possibilities can be reduced. This study compares vegetable and other crops (with and without a cover crop) planted the year before potato and their effects on potato planted the subsequent year.
In 2001, ten crops (cabbage, carrot, field corn, sweetcorn, edible bean, onion, potato, soybean, sugarbeet, wheat) were planted on the study area. These crops were managed according to standard production practices for each crop and were harvested in late summer or fall of 2001. A cover crop was planted on half of each plot, either during crop growth (for corn) or after harvest (all other crops). Potato was planted in the spring of 2002 following the materials and methods below.
Soil (2001 values): |
Maddock sandy loam and Egeland loam; pH=7.6; 2.3% organic matter; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was medium. |
Previous crop: |
2001 - see Table 55; 2000 - field corn, sweetcorn, garden pea, and onion; 1999 - edible bean, carrot, and pumpkin. |
Seedbed preparation: |
Disked plots not planted with cover crop on 1 Nov 2001. All plots coulter chiseled 15 inches deep on Apr 18 and disked on 2 May 2002 to incorporate fertilizer. |
Planting: |
‘Russet Burbank’ potato seed pieces were planted 1 ft apart in rows 3 ft wide on May 3. |
Plots: |
We used a split-plot design with four replications. Main plots (for crops) were 20 x 80 ft. Each main plot was divided into two subplots, 20 x 40 ft. One subplot was not fall tilled and was planted to a cover crop. The other subplot was fall tilled and did not have a cover crop. |
Fertilizer: |
On April 18, broadcast 18 lbs N/acre and 20 lbs S/acre as 21-0-0-24. Sprayed 28-0-0 on May 2 to bring soil test N + applied N to 57 lbs/acre. Side dressed 70 lb N/acre as urea on June 6. Fertigated 30 lbs N/acre as 32-0-0 on July 26. |
Irrigation: |
Sprinkler irrigation as needed. |
Pest control: |
Weeds were controlled by: dragging off on May 22; hilling on June 6; Poast + Dash (1.5 pt + 1 pt/acre on May 24); Dual II + Prowl (1.5 pt + 1.5 pt/acre on Jun 6); Matrix (1 oz/acre on Jun 21); rototilling between plots, and hand weeding. Admire (1.3 oz/1000 ft applied at planting), Asana (8 oz/acre on Jul 22) and Ambush (12 oz/acre on Aug 16 and Aug 27), controlled Colorado Potato Beetle. Diseases were controlled by: treating seed pieces with Maxim dust (25 lb/cwt); Ridomil MZ72 (2.5 lb/acre on Jul 3 and Jul 22); Rovral (2 pt/acre on Jul 15, Jul 31 and Aug 16); Manzate (1.5 and 2 lbs/acre on Jul 9 and Aug 7); and Dithane F45 (1.6 qt/acre on Aug 27). |
Harvest: |
Harvested an 8 foot section of the center two rows. Reps 3 and 4 were harvested Sep 19 to Sep 23. Reps 1 and 2 were harvested Oct 8 to Oct 10. |
Go to top of potato previous crop report
Ten crops (cabbage, carrot, field corn, sweetcorn, edible bean, onion, potato, soybean, and wheat) were planted in 2001 at the Oakes Irrigation Research Site. All of these previous crops were grown successfully and managed according to standard production practices for each crop. Cover crops planted after wheat and cabbage harvest, and at last cultivation in field and sweet corn, were well established before winter. The rye planted after harvest of carrot, edible bean, onion, potato, sugar beet, and soybean grew well but did not have time to establish much cover before winter. Disease ratings were taken in the fall of 2002.
Spring soil tests ranged from 24 lbs N/acre after wheat to 57 lbs N/acre after potato (Table 56). Soil N was lower in the no-fall-till/cover crop treatment than in the fall tillage treatment.
Potato yields and quality were not significantly affected by the previous crop or the tillage/cover crop treatments (Table 57). Disease on potato vines was higher when the previous crop was potato or sugar beet. The cover crop increased potato disease in combination with some previous crops (cabbage, potato, and sugar beet) and decreased potato disease with other previous crops (carrot and corn) (Table 56).
Go to top of potato previous crop report
Table 55. Previous crop management treatments.
2001 Crop |
Variety or hybrid |
Crop Planting date |
Crop Harvest date |
Cover crop |
Cover crop planting date |
Herbicides |
Total N applied |
|
|||||||
Cabbage |
Charmant |
Apr 27 |
Aug 2 & 3 |
hairy vetch & forage sorghum |
Aug 8 |
Treflan, Dacthal, Poast, Lentagran |
228 lbs |
Carrot |
Bolero |
May 16 |
Aug 20, 28, 29 |
rye |
Aug 31 |
Treflan, Lorox, Poast |
168 lbs |
Field corn |
Pioneer 38K07 |
May 1 |
Oct 5 |
hairy vetch |
Jun 26 |
Frontier + Cypro |
293 lbs |
Sweetcorn |
Honey Select |
May 4 |
Aug 6 |
hairy vetch |
Jun 26 |
Dual II |
233 lbs |
Edible bean |
Navigator (Navy) |
May 17 |
Sep 24 |
rye |
Sep 25 |
Treflan, Dual II, Poast |
118 lbs |
Onion |
Teton |
Apr 27 |
Sep 6 |
rye |
Sep 25 |
Prowl, Poast, Buctril + Goal |
228 lbs |
Potato |
Russet Burbank |
May 10 |
Sep 24 & 25 |
rye |
Sep 25 |
Dual II + Prowl, Poast, Matrix |
223 lbs |
Soybean |
Novartis X9904RC |
May 17 |
Sep 24 |
rye |
Sep 25 |
Treflan, Dual II, Roundup, Basagran |
118 lbs |
Sugarbeet |
Blazer |
May 11 |
Sep 24 & 25 |
rye |
Sep 25 |
Tillam, Nortron, Betamix + Upbeet |
168 lbs |
Wheat |
Russ |
Apr 26 |
Aug 12 |
hairy vetch |
Aug 13 |
Buctril |
168 lbs |
Go to top of potato previous crop report
Table 56. 2002 spring soil N tests and fall disease ratings in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2002 crops previous to potato study.
Treatment (2001) |
Cover crop |
Soil Nitrogen |
Disease rating |
||
0 to 6" |
6 to 24" |
Total |
|||
|
|
-------------------- lbs/acre --------------------- |
0 to 101 |
||
Previous crop by Cover crop |
|||||
cabbage |
No |
22.0 bc2 |
27.0 b |
49.0 b |
1.5 a |
Yes |
17.0 cde |
15.0 f-i |
32.0 cd |
3.3 b-e |
|
carrot |
No |
20.8 bcd |
22.5 b-f |
43.3 bc |
2.5 abc |
Yes |
4.5 j |
10.5 hi |
15.0 g |
1.5 a |
|
field corn |
No |
15.0 d-h |
23.3 bd |
38.3 bcd |
4.3 e-h |
Yes |
14.0 e-h |
14.3 ghi |
28.3 def |
3.0 bcd |
|
sweet corn |
No |
20.0 bcd |
28.3 b |
49.6 b |
3.0 bcd |
Yes |
15.0 efg |
17.3 c-h |
32.3 cd |
2.3 ab |
|
edible bean |
No |
23.5 b |
15.0 d-i |
38.8 bcd |
3.0 bcd |
Yes |
11.8 f-i |
15.0 e-i |
26.8 def |
2.5 abc |
|
onion |
No |
16.8 c-f |
20.8 b-g |
37.5 bcd |
2.3 ab |
Yes |
9.8 hi |
21.8 b-e |
31.5 cde |
3.0 bcd |
|
potato |
No |
33.0 a |
51.8 a |
84.8 a |
4.8 gh |
Yes |
10.8 ghi |
20.8 b-g |
29.1 def |
6.3 i |
|
soybean |
No |
20.5 bcd |
24.0 bc |
44.5 b |
3.5 c-f |
Yes |
7.8 ij |
11.3 hi |
19.0 fg |
3.8 d-g |
|
sugar beet |
No |
21.3 bc |
22.5 bcd |
43.8 b |
4.5 fgh |
Yes |
8.3 ij |
9.8 i |
18.0 fg |
5.0 h |
|
wheat |
No |
13.8 e-h |
13.5 f-i |
27.3 def |
3.5 c-f |
Yes |
10.5 ghi |
10.5 hi |
21.0 efg |
3.3 b-e |
|
|
|||||
Probability |
<.0001 |
0.0008 |
0.0002 |
0.004 |
|
Previous crop (averaged over cover crop) |
|||||
cabbage |
19.5 ab |
21.0 b |
40.5 bc |
2.4 a |
|
carrot |
12.7 d |
16.5 bc |
29.2 d |
2.0 a |
|
field corn |
14.5 cd |
18.8 bc |
33.3 bcd |
3.6 ab |
|
sweet corn |
17.5 bc |
22.8 b |
40.9 b |
2.6 a |
|
edible bean |
17.6 bc |
15.0 bc |
32.8 bcd |
2.8 a |
|
onion |
13.3 d |
21.3 b |
34.5 bcd |
2.6 a |
|
potato |
21.9 a |
36.3 a |
56.9 a |
5.5 c |
|
soybean |
14.1 cd |
17.6 bc |
31.8 bcd |
3.6 ab |
|
sugar beet |
14.8 cd |
16.1 bc |
30.9 cd |
4.8 bc |
|
wheat |
12.1 d |
12.0 c |
24.2 d |
3.4 ab |
|
|
|||||
Probability |
0.0003 |
0.0002 |
<.0001 |
0.004 |
|
Cover Crop (averaged over previous crop) |
|||||
No |
20.7 |
24.9 |
45.7 |
3.3 |
|
Yes |
10.9 |
14.6 |
25.3 |
3.4 |
|
|
|||||
Probability |
<.0001 |
<.0001 |
<.0001 |
0.57 |
|
C.V. (%) |
22 |
25 |
20 |
23 |
1Ratings are 0 = no disease to 10 = complete death of plant due to disease.
2Values in the same column and section followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level.
Go to top of potato previous crop report
Table 57. 2002 spring soil organic matter and pH, and fall potato yield and quality in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2002 crops previous to potato study.
Treatment (2001) |
Soil OM1 |
Soil pH |
US #1 yield |
Total yield |
Tuber size |
Hollow heart |
Specific gravity |
|
% |
|
------ cwt/acre ------ |
oz/tuber |
% |
g/cm3 |
|
Previous crop |
|||||||
cabbage |
2.3 |
7.6 |
275 |
342 |
7.8 |
72 |
1.076 |
carrot |
2.3 |
7.7 |
283 |
356 |
7.8 |
83 |
1.078 |
field corn |
2.4 |
7.6 |
276 |
361 |
7.9 |
73 |
1.075 |
sweet corn |
2.4 |
7.6 |
294 |
370 |
7.6 |
65 |
1.075 |
edible bean |
2.4 |
7.6 |
276 |
348 |
7.7 |
73 |
1.077 |
onion |
2.3 |
7.6 |
297 |
371 |
7.8 |
68 |
1.078 |
potato |
2.4 |
7.6 |
289 |
379 |
7.7 |
80 |
1.074 |
soybean |
2.4 |
7.7 |
332 |
416 |
8.0 |
83 |
1.077 |
sugar beet |
2.4 |
7.8 |
296 |
365 |
7.7 |
80 |
1.077 |
wheat |
2.3 |
7.7 |
316 |
389 |
7.5 |
78 |
1.078 |
|
|||||||
Probability |
0.99 |
0.65 |
0.39 |
0.38 |
0.98 |
0.66 |
0.91 |
Cover Crop |
|||||||
No |
2.3 |
7.6 |
293 |
366 |
7.7 |
74 |
1.077 |
Yes |
2.4 |
7.6 |
294 |
373 |
7.8 |
77 |
1.076 |
|
|||||||
Probability |
0.22 |
0.21 |
0.93 |
0.58 |
0.83 |
0.58 |
0.80 |
C.V. (%) |
11 |
1 |
16 |
14 |
6 |
25 |
0.4 |
1Organic matter.
Note: For these measurements, there were no previous crop by cover crop interactions.
Go to top of potato previous crop report
Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site rotation studies page
Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2002 annual report