Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension Center * North Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Voice: (701) 742-2189, FAX: (701) 742-2700, email: rgreenla@ndsuext.nodak.edu

 

EFFECTS OF PREVIOUS CROPS ON POTATO

Richard Greenland


Materials and methods

Results summary

Table 55. Previous crop management treatments

Table 56. 2002 spring soil N tests and fall disease ratings

Table 57. 2002 spring soil organic matter and pH, and fall potato yield and quality



INTRODUCTION

          To reduce disease problems and maintain potato quality, potato should be planted in a field only once every three or four years. The crops grown the other two or three years can affect the yield and quality of potatoes and the economic viability of the farming system. Presently, farmers earn money the year they plant potato (or rent their land for potato production), then have two or three lean years until they can plant potato again. This tempts many to shorten the rotation interval, resulting in increased possibility of crop failure, or yield and quality reduction when they do plant potato. Producers are requesting information concerning rotations involving potato. One alternative is to grow vegetables such as carrot, cabbage, onion, or sweetcorn in rotation with potato. These are high value crops that require irrigation and could increase farmer income substantially in years when potato is not grown. However, little information is available on the effects of vegetable crops planted in rotation with potato. Research indicates that some crops in the brassica family (of which cabbage is a member) reduce disease in potato planted the following year. Carrots may increase deleterious nematode numbers in some areas but may not be a problem in North Dakota. Standard rotations involving potato need to be developed. Given 10 crops with three or four year rotations, there are almost a thousand different rotations possible that include potato. By determining which crops potato does well or poorly after, the number of possibilities can be reduced. This study compares vegetable and other crops (with and without a cover crop) planted the year before potato and their effects on potato planted the subsequent year.

          In 2001, ten crops (cabbage, carrot, field corn, sweetcorn, edible bean, onion, potato, soybean, sugarbeet, wheat) were planted on the study area. These crops were managed according to standard production practices for each crop and were harvested in late summer or fall of 2001. A cover crop was planted on half of each plot, either during crop growth (for corn) or after harvest (all other crops). Potato was planted in the spring of 2002 following the materials and methods below.


MATERIALS AND METHODS


Soil

(2001 values):

Maddock sandy loam and Egeland loam; pH=7.6; 2.3% organic matter; soil-P and soil-K were very high; soil-S was medium.

Previous crop:

2001 - see Table 55; 2000 - field corn, sweetcorn, garden pea, and onion;

1999 - edible bean, carrot, and pumpkin.

Seedbed preparation:

Disked plots not planted with cover crop on 1 Nov 2001. All plots coulter chiseled 15 inches deep on Apr 18 and disked on 2 May 2002 to incorporate fertilizer.

Planting:

‘Russet Burbank’ potato seed pieces were planted 1 ft apart in rows 3 ft wide on May 3.

Plots:

We used a split-plot design with four replications. Main plots (for crops) were 20 x 80 ft. Each main plot was divided into two subplots, 20 x 40 ft. One subplot was not fall tilled and was planted to a cover crop. The other subplot was fall tilled and did not have a cover crop.

Fertilizer:

On April 18, broadcast 18 lbs N/acre and 20 lbs S/acre as 21-0-0-24. Sprayed 28-0-0 on May 2 to bring soil test N + applied N to 57 lbs/acre. Side dressed 70 lb N/acre as urea on June 6. Fertigated 30 lbs N/acre as 32-0-0 on July 26.

Irrigation:

Sprinkler irrigation as needed.

Pest control:

Weeds were controlled by: dragging off on May 22; hilling on June 6; Poast + Dash (1.5 pt + 1 pt/acre on May 24); Dual II + Prowl (1.5 pt + 1.5 pt/acre on Jun 6); Matrix (1 oz/acre on Jun 21); rototilling between plots, and hand weeding. Admire (1.3 oz/1000 ft applied at planting), Asana (8 oz/acre on Jul 22) and Ambush (12 oz/acre on Aug 16 and Aug 27), controlled Colorado Potato Beetle. Diseases were controlled by: treating seed pieces with Maxim dust (25 lb/cwt); Ridomil MZ72 (2.5 lb/acre on Jul 3 and Jul 22); Rovral (2 pt/acre on Jul 15, Jul 31 and Aug 16); Manzate (1.5 and 2 lbs/acre on Jul 9 and Aug 7); and Dithane F45 (1.6 qt/acre on Aug 27).

Harvest:

Harvested an 8 foot section of the center two rows. Reps 3 and 4 were harvested Sep 19 to Sep 23. Reps 1 and 2 were harvested Oct 8 to Oct 10.


Go to top of potato previous crop report


RESULTS


          Ten crops (cabbage, carrot, field corn, sweetcorn, edible bean, onion, potato, soybean, and wheat) were planted in 2001 at the Oakes Irrigation Research Site. All of these previous crops were grown successfully and managed according to standard production practices for each crop. Cover crops planted after wheat and cabbage harvest, and at last cultivation in field and sweet corn, were well established before winter. The rye planted after harvest of carrot, edible bean, onion, potato, sugar beet, and soybean grew well but did not have time to establish much cover before winter. Disease ratings were taken in the fall of 2002.

          Spring soil tests ranged from 24 lbs N/acre after wheat to 57 lbs N/acre after potato (Table 56). Soil N was lower in the no-fall-till/cover crop treatment than in the fall tillage treatment.

          Potato yields and quality were not significantly affected by the previous crop or the tillage/cover crop treatments (Table 57). Disease on potato vines was higher when the previous crop was potato or sugar beet. The cover crop increased potato disease in combination with some previous crops (cabbage, potato, and sugar beet) and decreased potato disease with other previous crops (carrot and corn) (Table 56).


Go to top of potato previous crop report


Table 55. Previous crop management treatments.

2001 Crop

Variety or hybrid

Crop Planting date

Crop Harvest date

Cover crop

Cover crop planting date

Herbicides

Total N applied

 

Cabbage

Charmant

Apr 27

Aug 2 & 3

hairy vetch & forage sorghum

Aug 8

Treflan, Dacthal, Poast, Lentagran

228 lbs

Carrot

Bolero

May 16

Aug 20, 28, 29

rye

Aug 31

Treflan, Lorox, Poast

168 lbs

Field corn

Pioneer 38K07

May 1

Oct 5

hairy vetch

Jun 26

Frontier + Cypro

293 lbs

Sweetcorn

Honey Select

May 4

Aug 6

hairy vetch

Jun 26

Dual II

233 lbs

Edible bean

Navigator (Navy)

May 17

Sep 24

rye

Sep 25

Treflan, Dual II, Poast

118 lbs

Onion

Teton

Apr 27

Sep 6

rye

Sep 25

Prowl, Poast, Buctril + Goal

228 lbs

Potato

Russet Burbank

May 10

Sep 24 & 25

rye

Sep 25

Dual II + Prowl, Poast, Matrix

223 lbs

Soybean

Novartis X9904RC

May 17

Sep 24

rye

Sep 25

Treflan, Dual II, Roundup, Basagran

118 lbs

Sugarbeet

Blazer

May 11

Sep 24 & 25

rye

Sep 25

Tillam, Nortron, Betamix + Upbeet

168 lbs

Wheat

Russ

Apr 26

Aug 12

hairy vetch

Aug 13

Buctril

168 lbs


Go to top of potato previous crop report


Table 56. 2002 spring soil N tests and fall disease ratings in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2002 crops previous to potato study.

Treatment (2001)

Cover crop

Soil Nitrogen

Disease

rating

0 to 6"

6 to 24"

Total

 

 

-------------------- lbs/acre ---------------------

0 to 101

Previous crop by Cover crop

cabbage

No

22.0 bc2

27.0 b

49.0 b

1.5 a

Yes

17.0 cde

15.0 f-i

32.0 cd

3.3 b-e

carrot

No

20.8 bcd

22.5 b-f

43.3 bc

2.5 abc

Yes

 4.5 j

10.5 hi

15.0 g

1.5 a

field corn

No

15.0 d-h

23.3 bd

38.3 bcd

4.3 e-h

Yes

14.0 e-h

14.3 ghi

28.3 def

3.0 bcd

sweet corn

No

20.0 bcd

28.3 b

49.6 b

3.0 bcd

Yes

15.0 efg

17.3 c-h

32.3 cd

2.3 ab

edible bean

No

23.5 b

15.0 d-i

38.8 bcd

3.0 bcd

Yes

11.8 f-i

15.0 e-i

26.8 def

2.5 abc

onion

No

16.8 c-f

20.8 b-g

37.5 bcd

2.3 ab

Yes

 9.8 hi

21.8 b-e

31.5 cde

3.0 bcd

potato

No

33.0 a

51.8 a

84.8 a

4.8 gh

Yes

10.8 ghi

20.8 b-g

29.1 def

6.3 i

soybean

No

20.5 bcd

24.0 bc

44.5 b

3.5 c-f

Yes

 7.8 ij

11.3 hi

19.0 fg

3.8 d-g

sugar beet

No

21.3 bc

22.5 bcd

43.8 b

4.5 fgh

Yes

 8.3 ij

 9.8 i

18.0 fg

5.0 h

wheat

No

13.8 e-h

13.5 f-i

27.3 def

3.5 c-f

Yes

10.5 ghi

10.5 hi

21.0 efg

3.3 b-e

 

Probability

<.0001

0.0008

0.0002

0.004

Previous crop (averaged over cover crop)

cabbage

19.5 ab

21.0 b

40.5 bc

2.4 a

carrot

12.7 d

16.5 bc

29.2 d

2.0 a

field corn

14.5 cd

18.8 bc

33.3 bcd

3.6 ab

sweet corn

17.5 bc

22.8 b

40.9 b

2.6 a

edible bean

17.6 bc

15.0 bc

32.8 bcd

2.8 a

onion

13.3 d

21.3 b

34.5 bcd

2.6 a

potato

21.9 a

36.3 a

56.9 a

5.5 c

soybean

14.1 cd

17.6 bc

31.8 bcd

3.6 ab

sugar beet

14.8 cd

16.1 bc

30.9 cd

4.8 bc

wheat

12.1 d

12.0 c

24.2 d

3.4 ab

 

Probability

0.0003

0.0002

<.0001

0.004

Cover Crop (averaged over previous crop)

No

20.7

24.9

45.7

3.3

Yes

10.9

14.6

25.3

3.4

 

Probability

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

0.57

C.V. (%)

22

25

20

23

1Ratings are 0 = no disease to 10 = complete death of plant due to disease.

2Values in the same column and section followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05

  level.


Go to top of potato previous crop report


Table 57. 2002 spring soil organic matter and pH, and fall potato yield and quality in the Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2002 crops previous to potato study.

Treatment (2001)

Soil OM1

Soil pH

US #1 yield

Total yield

Tuber size

Hollow heart

Specific gravity

 

%

 

------ cwt/acre ------

oz/tuber

%

g/cm3

Previous crop

cabbage

2.3

7.6

275

342

7.8

72

1.076

carrot

2.3

7.7

283

356

7.8

83

1.078

field corn

2.4

7.6

276

361

7.9

73

1.075

sweet corn

2.4

7.6

294

370

7.6

65

1.075

edible bean

2.4

7.6

276

348

7.7

73

1.077

onion

2.3

7.6

297

371

7.8

68

1.078

potato

2.4

7.6

289

379

7.7

80

1.074

soybean

2.4

7.7

332

416

8.0

83

1.077

sugar beet

2.4

7.8

296

365

7.7

80

1.077

wheat

2.3

7.7

316

389

7.5

78

1.078

 

Probability

0.99

0.65

0.39

0.38

0.98

0.66

0.91

Cover Crop

No

2.3

7.6

293

366

7.7

74

1.077

Yes

2.4

7.6

294

373

7.8

77

1.076

 

Probability

0.22

0.21

0.93

0.58

0.83

0.58

0.80

C.V. (%)

11

1

16

14

6

25

0.4

1Organic matter.


Note: For these measurements, there were no previous crop by cover crop interactions.


Go to top of potato previous crop report


Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site rotation studies page

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2002 annual report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site crop index

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page