-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans - Carrington (summary)
-
Fungicides that contained azoxystrobin or pyraclostrobin active ingredients (Headline, Quadris, Quadris Opti, and Priaxor) provided good control of foliar anthracnose symptoms, but it was unclear whether any fungicides might provide satisfactory control of anthracnose related seed discoloration. Due to drought stress and high soil salinity at the site used for this trial, the yield response to using fungicides to control anthracnose could not be properly assessed.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans - Carrington (technical report)
-
Fungicides that contained azoxystrobin or pyraclostrobin active ingredients (Headline, Quadris, Quadris Opti, and Priaxor) provided good control of foliar anthracnose symptoms, but it was unclear whether any fungicides might provide satisfactory control of anthracnose related seed discoloration. Due to drought stress and high soil salinity at the site used for this trial, the yield response to using fungicides to control anthracnose could not be properly assessed.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Sykeston (summary)
-
The registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris gave good control of anthracnose. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. When applied as two sequential applications, the registered fungicides Endura, Proline, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Sykeston (technical report)
-
The registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris gave good control of anthracnose. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. When applied as two sequential applications, the registered fungicides Endura, Proline, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Williston (summary)
-
Under moderate anthracnose pressure, the registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris performed well. When applied as two sequential applications, Endura and Proline did not provide satisfactory disease control. Vertisan showed intermediate performance. Disease development occurred late in crop development, and the yield response to fungicide usage was low.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Williston (technical report)
-
Under moderate anthracnose pressure, the registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris performed well. When applied as two sequential applications, Endura and Proline did not provide satisfactory disease control. Vertisan showed intermediate performance. Disease development occurred late in crop development, and the yield response to fungicide usage was low.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas, Minot
-
The results from a 2012 experiment by North Dakota State University to evaluate fungicides for management of ascochyta blight of chickpeas. This trial was held at Minot.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - 25 miles east of Williston (summary)
-
Priaxor and Proline both performed well; rotational strategies with Proline and Priaxor performed equivalently as sequential applications of either product; and the 4 fl oz/ac application rate of Priaxor was sufficient. Additional data is needed to evaluate whether Vertisan may perform equivalently to Priaxor when applied in rotation with Proline.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - 25 miles east of Williston (technical report)
-
Priaxor and Proline both performed well; rotational strategies with Proline and Priaxor performed equivalently as sequential applications of either product; and the 4 fl oz/ac application rate of Priaxor was sufficient. Additional data is needed to evaluate whether Vertisan may perform equivalently to Priaxor when applied in rotation with Proline.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
-
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - Carrington (summary)
-
Disease pressure was inadequate to rigorously assess fungicide efficacy in this trial, but the disease control trends were very similar to those observed in the parallel trial conducted in Williston in 2012. To ensure more informative results in future trials, irrigation will be used in future chickpea fungicide trials in Carrington when the weather is unfavorable for disease development.
Located in
Archive
/
…
/
PlantPathologyRD
/
Docs2012
