Crop & Pest Report

Accessibility


| Share

Does Delayed Planting of Spring Wheat Mean Lower Yields? (05/03/18)

Spring wheat planting is off to a slow start, with only three percent of the area planted compared to 22% for the 5-year average.

Does Delayed Planting of Spring Wheat Mean Lower Yields?

Spring wheat planting is off to a slow start, with only three percent of the area planted compared to 22% for the 5-year average. Research has repeatedly shown that delayed planting can have a detrimental effect on the yield of small grains. Planting date is one way we can partially “manage” the weather environment in which the small grain crop grows. Earlier planting usually means that temperatures are more favorable during tillering and spike formation. Cooler temperatures during this early vegetative period promote more tillering and larger spikes. This is the time that the crop establishes its foundation for its potential yield. Additionally, when compared to later planting dates, earlier planting usually means that grain-filling will take place when temperatures are relatively cooler. Warmer than optimal temperature during grain-filling reduces the amount of photosynthate available to the developing kernels. Hence the recommendation that one should plant early in order to improve the chances of higher yield. Nevertheless, there are a lot of other factors that can ultimately impact grain yield, regardless of planting date. Nitrogen availability (N losses due to leaching and denitrification), drought, diseases, and lodging are examples of factors that can impact yield even when the weather might otherwise be favorable.

The intent of this article is to examine the relationship between planting date and final yield on a statewide basis (rather than results from small-plot research) using planting progress data and final yield that is available from USDA-NASS. In the graph below, I summarize data from the past 10 years, relating the estimated date when 50% of the spring wheat area had been planted and the yield that was achieved later that season. For the purposes of this article, to fix a 50% planted date, I extrapolated between the NASS reporting dates when there was less than 50% planted and when there was more than 50% planted. The yield values were those reported for the state as a whole. I used information for spring wheat only.

During the last 10 seasons the date at which 50% of the spring wheat was planted ranged from April 23 to May 27, with an average date of May 10. Given our very slow planting progress to date, it seems likely that much of the planting will be later than optimal, but with the current planting capabilities in the state, it is still feasible that 50% of the acres could be planted by the average date of May 10th if field conditions are favorable.

It is interesting to note from the graph below that there was little relationship between date to 50% planting and yield. In fact, three of the highest yielding seasons (2009, 2013 and 2014) occurred when most of the planting occurred after May 15. Moreover, in 2008 which was the third earliest date to achieve 50% planted, it was second lowest yielding of the group. The lowest yielding year (2011) in this dataset was the latest planted, suggesting that perhaps after that date, yield reductions will be significant even if the rest of the growing season remains favorable for wheat development and yield.

Though these data seem to suggest, when considering the state as a whole, that planting date may not be an important determinant of yield, I think that other research strongly suggests planting as early as is practical is critical to achieving the best chance of producing high yields in a given season.

ransom

Joel Ransom

Extension Agronomist for Cereal Crops

This site is supported in part by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Program [grant no. 2017-70006-27144/accession 1013592] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the website author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

USDA logo

Creative Commons License
Feel free to use and share this content, but please do so under the conditions of our Creative Commons license and our Rules for Use. Thanks.