Docs2012

2012 Field Evaluation of Commercial Lentil Varieties for Susceptibility to Anthracnose - Carrington (summary): ‘CDC Imigreen CL’ (a medium-green lentil) and ‘CDC Viceroy’ (a small green lentil) exhibited the best resistance to anthracnose. The medium-green lentil ‘CDC Richlea’ and the large-green lentils ‘Pennell’ and ‘Riveland’ showed elevated susceptibility to anthracnose.
2012 Field Evaluation of Commercial Lentil Varieties for Susceptibility to Sclerotinia - Carrington (summary): The small-green lentil ‘CDC Viceroy’, extra-small red lentil ‘CDC Impala CL’, and small-red lentil ‘CDC Maxim CL’ exhibited excellent tolerance to Sclerotinia and yielded well under high Sclerotinia disease pressure. Among medium-green lentils, ‘CDC Imigreen CL’ was less susceptible to Sclerotinia than ‘CDC Impress CL’; ‘CDC Richlea’ exhibited intermediate performance. The large-green lentils ‘Pennell’ and ‘Riveland’ performed poorly under high Sclerotinia disease pressure.
2012 Field Evaluation of Contans for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot: Evaluation of Application Rate and Timing (summary): Contans reduced both the viability and vigor of sclerotia, fall applications of Contans were more effective than spring applications, and Contans performed equivalently at 1 lb/ac and 2 lbs/ac. The results suggest that Contans may be a useful tool for degrading sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and reducing Sclerotinia disease pressure.
2012 Field Evaluation of Contans for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot: Evaluation of Application Rate and Timing (technical report): Contans reduced both the viability and vigor of sclerotia, fall applications of Contans were more effective than spring applications, and Contans performed equivalently at 1 lb/ac and 2 lbs/ac. The results suggest that Contans may be a useful tool for degrading sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and reducing Sclerotinia disease pressure.
2012 Field Evaluation of Contans for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot: Evaluation of Incorporation Methods (summary): Under the conditions tested in this trial (sclerotia primarily on the soil surface at the time of Contans application and moist soils at the time of Contans application) manual incorporation of Contans (by harrowing to 1.5 inches), water incorporation (with 1 inch of water), and no incorporation performed similarly. Different results may be obtained when sclerotia are evenly distributed in the soil profile.
2012 Field Evaluation of Contans for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot: Evaluation of Incorporation Methods (technical report): Under the conditions tested in this trial (sclerotia primarily on the soil surface at the time of Contans application and moist soils at the time of Contans application) manual incorporation of Contans (by harrowing to 1.5 inches), water incorporation (with 1 inch of water), and no incorporation performed similarly. Different results may be obtained when sclerotia are evenly distributed in the soil profile.
2012 Field Evaluation of Contans for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot: Spring Application Timing - Carrington (summary): Contans applications made in the spring sharply reduced the number of apothecia produced per sclerotium but had only a modest impact on the viability of sclerotia. Contans performed similarlly irrespective of when it was applied in the spring; applications made 2 days prior to planting soybeans performed similarly to applications made 38 days prior to planting soybeans.
2012 Field Evaluation of Contans for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot: Spring Application Timing - Carrington (technical report): Contans applications made in the spring sharply reduced the number of apothecia produced per sclerotium but had only a modest impact on the viability of sclerotia. Contans performed similarlly irrespective of when it was applied in the spring; applications made 2 days prior to planting soybeans performed similarly to applications made 38 days prior to planting soybeans.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicide Treated Buffer Strips for Management of Ascochyta Blight on Lentils Grown Adjacent to a Previous Lentil Crop - Valley County, MT (summary): When lentils are planted adjacent to a field where lentils were grown the previous year, a pronounced gradient of Ascochyta blight is often observed. In this study, neither the use of a 90-foot-wide or 270-foot-wide fungicide treated strip provided satisfactory disease control in the lentils grown immediately adjacent to the previous year’s lentil crop. We conclude that the use of a fungicide-treated strip is a risky strategy, and that a foliar fungicide application to the entire field may be advisable in lentils planted adjacent to a field where they were seeded the previous year, especially when weather conditions favor the disease.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides and Partial Host Resistance for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Soybeans - Carrington (summary): Under moderate Sclerotinia disease pressure, Endura but not Proline or Cobra applied as a single application at early bloom (early R2 growth stage) significantly reduced Sclerotinia stem rot relative to the control. Under the narrow 7-inch row spacing used, fungicides were a more effective tool for managing Sclerotinia stem rot than the use of partially resistant varieties.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides and Partial Host Resistance for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Soybeans - Carrington (technical report): Under moderate Sclerotinia disease pressure, Endura but not Proline or Cobra applied as a single application at early bloom (early R2 growth stage) significantly reduced Sclerotinia stem rot relative to the control. Under the narrow 7-inch row spacing used, fungicides were a more effective tool for managing Sclerotinia stem rot than the use of partially resistant varieties.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides and Partial Host Resistance for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Soybeans - Carrington (technical report): Under moderate Sclerotinia disease pressure, Endura but not Proline or Cobra applied as a single application at early bloom (early R2 growth stage) significantly reduced Sclerotinia stem rot relative to the control. Under the narrow 7-inch row spacing used, fungicides were a more effective tool for managing Sclerotinia stem rot than the use of partially resistant varieties.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Control of Anthracnose on Lentils: Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Control of Anthracnose on Lentils - Sykeston, ND (2012)
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose and Sclerotinia on Lentils - Carrington (summary): Under high anthracnose disease pressure, the registered fungicides Headline and Priaxor provided good disease control and a strong yield response. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. When applied as two sequential applications, Endura, Proline, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control. Quadris showed intermediate performance.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose and Sclerotinia on Lentils - Carrington (technical report): Under high anthracnose disease pressure, the registered fungicides Headline and Priaxor provided good disease control and a strong yield response. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. When applied as two sequential applications, Endura, Proline, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control. Quadris showed intermediate performance.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans - Carrington (summary): Fungicides that contained azoxystrobin or pyraclostrobin active ingredients (Headline, Quadris, Quadris Opti, and Priaxor) provided good control of foliar anthracnose symptoms, but it was unclear whether any fungicides might provide satisfactory control of anthracnose related seed discoloration. Due to drought stress and high soil salinity at the site used for this trial, the yield response to using fungicides to control anthracnose could not be properly assessed.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans - Carrington (technical report): Fungicides that contained azoxystrobin or pyraclostrobin active ingredients (Headline, Quadris, Quadris Opti, and Priaxor) provided good control of foliar anthracnose symptoms, but it was unclear whether any fungicides might provide satisfactory control of anthracnose related seed discoloration. Due to drought stress and high soil salinity at the site used for this trial, the yield response to using fungicides to control anthracnose could not be properly assessed.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Sykeston (summary): The registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris gave good control of anthracnose. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. When applied as two sequential applications, the registered fungicides Endura, Proline, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Sykeston (technical report): The registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris gave good control of anthracnose. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. When applied as two sequential applications, the registered fungicides Endura, Proline, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Williston (summary): Under moderate anthracnose pressure, the registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris performed well. When applied as two sequential applications, Endura and Proline did not provide satisfactory disease control. Vertisan showed intermediate performance. Disease development occurred late in crop development, and the yield response to fungicide usage was low.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Anthracnose on Lentils - Williston (technical report): Under moderate anthracnose pressure, the registered fungicides Headline, Priaxor, and Quadris performed well. When applied as two sequential applications, Endura and Proline did not provide satisfactory disease control. Vertisan showed intermediate performance. Disease development occurred late in crop development, and the yield response to fungicide usage was low.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas, Minot: The results from a 2012 experiment by North Dakota State University to evaluate fungicides for management of ascochyta blight of chickpeas. This trial was held at Minot.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - 25 miles east of Williston (summary): Priaxor and Proline both performed well; rotational strategies with Proline and Priaxor performed equivalently as sequential applications of either product; and the 4 fl oz/ac application rate of Priaxor was sufficient. Additional data is needed to evaluate whether Vertisan may perform equivalently to Priaxor when applied in rotation with Proline.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - 25 miles east of Williston (technical report): Priaxor and Proline both performed well; rotational strategies with Proline and Priaxor performed equivalently as sequential applications of either product; and the 4 fl oz/ac application rate of Priaxor was sufficient. Additional data is needed to evaluate whether Vertisan may perform equivalently to Priaxor when applied in rotation with Proline.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - Carrington (summary): Disease pressure was inadequate to rigorously assess fungicide efficacy in this trial, but the disease control trends were very similar to those observed in the parallel trial conducted in Williston in 2012. To ensure more informative results in future trials, irrigation will be used in future chickpea fungicide trials in Carrington when the weather is unfavorable for disease development.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpeas - Carrington (technical report): Disease pressure was inadequate to rigorously assess fungicide efficacy in this trial, but the disease control trends were very similar to those observed in the parallel trial conducted in Williston in 2012. To ensure more informative results in future trials, irrigation will be used in future chickpea fungicide trials in Carrington when the weather is unfavorable for disease development.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight on Lentils - Carrington (summary): Under heavy Ascochyta blight pressure, the registered fungicides Headline and Priaxor performed well. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. The registered fungicides Endura, Proline, Quaris, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Ascochyta Blight on Lentils - Carrington (technical report): Under heavy Ascochyta blight pressure, the registered fungicides Headline and Priaxor performed well. It was not immediately apparent that Priaxor, which is a premix of the active ingredient found in Headline and another active ingredient, provided an advantage over Headline. The registered fungicides Endura, Proline, Quaris, and Vertisan did not provide satisfactory disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Mycosphaerella Blight of Field Peas - Carrington (summary): The registered fungicides Headline, Proline, and Priaxor provided excellent control of Mycosphaerella blight. Endura and Vertisan did not perform as well. There was a slight trend towards higher yield and better disease control as the application rate of Priaxor increased from 4 to 6 fl oz/ac.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Mycosphaerella Blight of Field Peas - Carrington (technical report): The registered fungicides Headline, Proline, and Priaxor provided excellent control of Mycosphaerella blight. Endura and Vertisan did not perform as well. There was a slight trend towards higher yield and better disease control as the application rate of Priaxor increased from 4 to 6 fl oz/ac.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans Planted to 15-inch Rows - Carrington (summary): Under conditions of high disease pressure (susceptible variety, temperature and rainfall conducive to Sclerotinia, and narrow row spacing), Endura at 8 oz/ac provided excellent control of Sclerotinia. Proline at 5.7 fl oz/ac, ProPulse at 8.6 fl oz/ac, and Topsin at 20 fl oz/ac did not provide satisfactory disease control. A rate response was apparent as the application rate of Topsin increased from 20 to 30 to 40 fl oz/ac.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans Planted to 15-inch Rows - Carrington (technical report): Under conditions of high disease pressure (susceptible variety, temperature and rainfall conducive to Sclerotinia, and narrow row spacing), Endura at 8 oz/ac provided excellent control of Sclerotinia. Proline at 5.7 fl oz/ac, ProPulse at 8.6 fl oz/ac, and Topsin at 20 fl oz/ac did not provide satisfactory disease control. A rate response was apparent as the application rate of Topsin increased from 20 to 30 to 40 fl oz/ac.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans Planted to 30-inch Rows - Carrington (technical report): Endura (8 oz/ac), ProPulse (8.6 fl oz/ac), and Switch (14 oz/ac) applied as two sequential applications and Topsin (40 fl oz/ac) followed by Endura (8 oz/ac) significantly reduced Sclerotinia disease severity relative to the control. Due to late disease onset, little or no yield response was observed in any of the fungicide treatments.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans Seeded to 30-inch Rows - Carrington (summary): Endura (8 oz/ac), ProPulse (8.6 fl oz/ac), and Switch (14 oz/ac) applied as two sequential applications and Topsin (40 fl oz/ac) followed by Endura (8 oz/ac) significantly reduced Sclerotinia disease severity relative to the control. Due to late disease onset, little or no yield response was observed in any of the fungicide treatments.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans Seeded to 30-inch Rows - Langdon (summary): ProPulse applied sequentially at 10.3 fl oz/ac was the only treatment to significantly reduce Sclerotinia disease severity relative to the control. Due to late disease onset, little or no yield response was observed in any of the fungicide treatments.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Dry Edible (pinto) Beans Seeded to 30-inch Rows - Langdon (technical report): ProPulse applied sequentially at 10.3 fl oz/ac was the only treatment to significantly reduce Sclerotinia disease severity relative to the control. Due to late disease onset, little or no yield response was observed in any of the fungicide treatments.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Lentils - Carrington (summary): None of the registered fungicides evaluated exhibited satisfactory Sclerotinia disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Lentils - Carrington (technical report): None of the registered fungicides evaluated exhibited satisfactory Sclerotinia disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Soybeans - Carrington (summary): Applied as a single application at early bloom (early R2 growth stage), Endura at 4 oz/ac, Endura at 8 oz/ac, Aproach at 12 fl oz/ac, and the tank-mix of Topsin at 20 fl oz/ac + Proline at 3 fl oz/ac exhibited a strong trend toward reduced Sclerotinia disease severity and increased yield relative to the control. However, additional testing will be needed to confirm that these treatments provide satisfactory disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Management of Sclerotinia on Soybeans - Carrington (technical report): Applied as a single application at early bloom (early R2 growth stage), Endura at 4 oz/ac, Endura at 8 oz/ac, Aproach at 12 fl oz/ac, and the tank-mix of Topsin at 20 fl oz/ac + Proline at 3 fl oz/ac exhibited a strong trend toward reduced Sclerotinia disease severity and increased yield relative to the control. However, additional testing will be needed to confirm that these treatments provide satisfactory disease control.
2012 Field Evaluation of New Versus Traditional Fungicides for Management of White Mold in Dry Beans: A trial to put fungicides in a side-by-side test to see how well each fungicide can control white mold.
2012 Field Evaluation of Sunflower Hybrids and Breeding Lines for Resistance to Sclerotinia Head Rot - Carrington, Langdon, and Oakes (summary): The commercial oilseed hybrids Syngenta ‘3990 NS/CL/DM’, Syngenta ‘NX24122’, Seeds 2000 ‘Camaro’, Seeds 2000 'Camaro II', Syngenta ‘NX24123’, Croplan ‘343 MDMR HO’, Seeds 2000 'Cobalt II', Seeds 2000 ‘Torino’, and Seeds 2000 ‘Cobalt’ performed well. The commercial non-oil hybrid Genosys ‘12GCF05’ gave promising results.
2012 Field Evaluation of Sunflower Hybrids and Breeding Lines for Resistance to Sclerotinia Head Rot - Carrington, Langdon, and Oakes (technical report): The commercial oilseed hybrids Syngenta ‘3990 NS/CL/DM’, Syngenta ‘NX24122’, Seeds 2000 'Camaro II', Seeds 2000 ‘Camaro’, Syngenta ‘NX24123’, Croplan ‘343 MDMR HO’, Seeds 2000 'Cobalt II', Seeds 2000 ‘Torino’, and Seeds 2000 ‘Cobalt’ performed well. The commercial non-oil hybrid Genosys ‘12GCF05’ gave promising results.
2012 Field Testing of Contans WG Suggests that the Product may be a Useful Tool for Managing Sclerotinia Diseases in North Dakota: A look at the effects of contans usage.
2012 FULL Chickpea Williston: Full report, 2012, chickpea Ascochyta fungicide evaluation, Williston
2012 Fungicide Evaluations for Suppression of Fusarium Head Blight (Scab) in Spring Wheat: The results from a 2012 experiment at the Carrington Research Extension Center to evaluate fungicides for suppression of fusarium head blight (scab) in spring wheat.
2012 ILLUSTR Chickpea Williston: Illustrated report, 2012 Chickpea fungicide evaluation, Williston.
2012 Lentil Ascochyta Fungicide Testing Results: Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Control of Ascochyta Blight of Lentils; Carrington, ND (2012)
2012 Lentil Ascochyta Fungicide Testing Results - Technical Report: Field Evaluation of Fungicides for Control of Ascochyta Blight of Lentils - Carrington, ND (2012) Technical Report
2012 Susceptibility of Commercial Lentil Varieties to Anthracnose and Sclerotinia: ‘CDC Imigreen CL’ (a medium-green lentil) and ‘CDC Viceroy’ (a small green lentil) exhibited the best resistance to anthracnose. The medium-green lentil ‘CDC Richlea’ and the large-green lentils ‘Pennell’ and ‘Riveland’ showed elevated susceptibility to anthracnose.
2012Af Contans Application Rate: Full report, 2012A, Carrington, efficacy of Contans for control of Sclerotinia at different application rates, fall vs spring
2012Af Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide Evaluation: Full report, 2012A, Carrington, Dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Af Soybean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Full report, 2012B, Carrington, field evaluation of fungicides for control of Sclerotinia on soybeans
2012Ai Contans Applic Rate: Illustrated report, 2012A, Carrington, efficacy of Contans for control of Sclerotinia at different application rates, fall vs spring
2012Ai Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012A, Carrington, dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Ai Soybean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012A, Carrington, field evaluation of fungicides for control of Sclerotinia on soybeans
2012Bf Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Full report, 2012B, Carrington, dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Bf Soybean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Full report, 2012B, Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation, Carrington
2012Bi Contans Springtime Apps: Illustrated report, 2012B, efficacy of Contans for control of Sclerotinia on soybeans, application timing of Contans applied in the spring.
2012Bi Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide Efficacy: Illustrated report, 2012B, Carrington, dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Bi Soybean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012, Carrington, field evaluation of fungicides for control of Sclerotinia on soybeans
2012Cf Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Full report, 2012C, Carrington, dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Ci Contans Application Methods: Illustrated report, 2012C, field evaluation of Contans for control of Sclerotinia on soybeans; assessment of incorporation methods for Contans.
2012Ci Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012C, Carrington, dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Ci Soybean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2013C, Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation on soybeans, Carrington.
2012Df Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide Evaluation: Full report, 2012D, Carrington, Dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation.
2012Di Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated Report, 2012D, Carrington, Dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation.
2012Ef Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Full report, 2012E, Carrington dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation
2012Ei Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012E, Carrington, dry bean fungicide efficacy evaluation
2012f Dry Bean Anthracnose Fungicide: Full report, 2012, New Rockford, dry bean anthracnose fungicide efficacy evaluation
2012f Field Pea Fungicide: Full report, 2012, Carrington field pea fungicide efficacy trial.
2012f Lentil Anthracnose Carrington: Full report; 2012 Carrington; fungicide efficacy for control of anthracnose on lentils.
2012f Lentil Anthracnose Sykeston: Full report, 2012 Sykeston, fungicide efficacy evaluation, lentil anthracnose.
2012f Lentil Anthracnose Williston: Full report, 2012 Williston; Lentil anthracnose fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012f Lentil Ascochyta Fungicide Evaluation: Full report, 2012, lentil Ascochyta blight foliar fungicide evaluation, Carrington.
2012f Lentil Sclerotinia Carrington: Full report; 2012 Carrington; Lentil Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012Ff Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Full report, 2012F, Langdon dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation
2012Fi Dry Bean Sclerotinia Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012F, Langdon dry bean Sclerotinia fungicide evaluation
2012i DryBean Anthracnose Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012, New Rockford, dry bean anthracnose fungicide efficacy evaluation
2012i Field Pea Fungicide: Illustrated report, 2012, Carrington field pea fungicide efficacy evaluation.
2012i Lentil Anthracnose: Illustrated report, 2012, fungicide efficacy for control of anthracnose on lentils, Carrington.
2012i Lentil Anthracnose Sykeston: Illustrated report; 2012, Sykeston; field evaluation of fungicides for control of anthracnose on lentils.
2012i Lentil Anthracnose Williston: Illustrated report; 2012, Williston; lentil anthracnose fungicide evaluation.
2012i Lentil Ascochyta Fungicide Evaluation: Illustrated report; 2012; Carrington; field evaluation of fungicides for control of Ascochyta blight.
2012i Lentil Sclerotinia Carrington: Illustrated report; 2012 Carrington; Lentil Sclerotinia fungicide efficacy evaluation.

North Dakota State University

Carrington Research Extension Center

Docs2012