1997 Municipal Sludge Trial
Eric Eriksmoen, Rick Olson and Tim Faller
Hettinger Research Extension Center
The utilization of sewage wastes to enhance crop production has been an
age-old practice with accounts dating back to the Roman Empire and ancient
China. Wastes were usually applied directly to the land without
processing. With concerns for human health, the practice was largely
discontinued in the twentieth century and treatment facilities were built
to contain wastes. Sludge from these facilities are commonly discharged
into large water bodies, dumped into landfills or incinerated. The cost
associated with transporting this material is often prohibitively high
especially if transported over a long distance. Rural communities may have
an advantage in being able to spread this material onto adjacent
agricultural land whereby reducing disposal fees for the municipality and
possibly benefitting crop production at the disposal site. Little regard
has been placed on its value in modern agriculture.
This trial was developed to study the effects of soil applied municipal
sludge as it relates to soil fertility and to study the effects of
municipal sludge on selected agronomic, yield and quality factors of four
small grain crops, Amidon hard red spring wheat, Medora durum, Bowman
barley and Otana oats.
Municipal sludge from the Hettinger City waste lagoons was applied in the
Fall of 1996 to the test site (Sludge) at a rate that covered the soil
surface to a 3 to 4 inch depth (about 11,000 cubic feet per acre). A
portion of the test site was cordoned off and was not treated with sludge
(untreated). The material was incorporated with a heavy field cultivator
prior to freeze up in the Fall of 1996. In the Spring of 1997 two passes
with an offset disc, set at a 5 inch depth, were performed. Prior to
planting, soil samples were taken from both treated and untreated areas
and comprehensive analysis performed. Those results show the following:
|
SLUDGE |
UNTREATED |
Depth/Inches |
0-6 |
6-24 |
24-48 |
0-6 |
6-24 |
24-48 |
N lb/ac |
72 |
54 |
104 |
4 |
18 |
16 |
P ppm |
27 |
-- |
-- |
3 |
-- |
-- |
K ppm |
290 |
-- |
-- |
135 |
-- |
-- |
pH |
7.0 |
-- |
-- |
7.1 |
-- |
-- |
EC mmho |
1.20 |
0.61 |
0.54 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
0.29 |
OM % |
2.7 |
-- |
-- |
1.7 |
-- |
-- |
S lb/ac |
141 |
423 |
-- |
7 |
35 |
-- |
Zn ppm |
14.0 |
-- |
-- |
0.4 |
-- |
-- |
Fe ppm |
93 |
-- |
-- |
19 |
-- |
-- |
Mn ppm |
22 |
-- |
-- |
8 |
-- |
-- |
Cu ppm |
6.3 |
-- |
-- |
0.5 |
-- |
-- |
Cl lb/ac |
25 |
142 |
-- |
3 |
18 |
-- |
The test site was planted on May 5, 1997 using a randomized complete block
design with 4 replications and harvested on August 13, 1997. Results of
this trial are shown in the following tables.
HARD RED SPRING WHEAT |
|
DURUM |
Trt |
Grain Yield |
Test Weight |
Grain Protein |
PlantHt |
|
Trt |
Grain Yield |
Test Weight |
Grain Protein |
PlantHt |
|
bu/ac |
lbs/bu |
% |
inch |
|
|
bu/ac |
lbs/bu |
% |
inch |
Untrt |
20.1 |
57.6 |
14.7 |
28 |
|
Untrt |
26.2 |
58.8 |
15.0 |
26 |
Sludge |
26.6 |
58.2 |
16.5 |
26 |
|
Sludge |
25.5 |
55.9 |
17.1 |
25 |
CV |
12.8 |
0.8 |
2.1 |
8 |
|
CV |
26.3 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
8 |
LSD 5% |
5.4 |
ns |
0.6 |
ns |
|
LSD 5% |
ns |
ns |
1.0 |
ns |
LSD 1% |
ns |
ns |
0.9 |
ns |
|
LSD 1% |
ns |
ns |
1.6 |
ns |
OATS |
|
|
BARLEY |
Trt |
Grain Yield |
TestWt |
PlantHt |
|
|
Trt |
Grain Yield |
TestWt |
GrainProt |
PlantHt |
|
bu/ac |
lbs/bu |
inch |
|
|
|
bu/ac |
lbs/bu |
% |
inch |
Untrt |
82.9 |
35.0 |
29 |
|
|
Untrt |
41.5 |
45.6 |
14.8 |
17 |
Sludge |
90.4 |
32.8 |
29 |
|
|
Sludge |
54.2 |
46.9 |
16.6 |
17 |
CV |
14.2 |
1.0 |
9 |
|
|
CV |
16.8 |
0.9 |
2.0 |
12 |
LSD 5% |
ns |
0.6 |
ns |
|
|
LSD 5% |
ns |
0.8 |
0.6 |
ns |
LSD 1% |
ns |
1.0 |
ns |
|
|
LSD 1% |
ns |
1.2 |
0.9 |
ns |
Grain yields did not change significantly for any crop except for HRS
wheat where there was a significant yield increase over the untreated. The
lack of a yield response may be due to drought conditions during the early
growing season and possible toxicity caused by salt accumulations from the
added sludge. Test weight increased significantly from the untreated to
the treated barley , was not significantly different for the HRS wheat and
durum and decreased significantly for the oats. This may again be a crop
response relating to salt accumulations. The addition of municipal sludge
resulted in a significant two percentage point boost in grain protein over
the untreated for all crops tested. Plant height was not affected.
The quantity of sludge applied in this study was excessive. It did however
demonstrate the sheer amount of plant nutrients, especially
micro-nutrients, contained in this material and its potential value as a
source of fertilizer. The addition of municipal sludge contributes
significantly to the level of available plant nutrients and this had a
direct impact on grain protein content. It is also obvious that soil
organic matter was significantly enhanced. The elevated level of
electrical conductivity would indicate an accumulation of salts which may
have been detrimental to plant growth. Excessive levels of some plant
nutrients are known to be phytotoxic and this may have been true in this
study also. Further research should address optimizing application levels
for optimum plant health and the human nutritional quality of harvested
grains from crops being treated with municipal sludge.
Back
Home|Events|Livestock|Economics|Agronomy|Range|Dakota
Ram|Sites|Staff|Mission|Contact |