North Dakota State University * Dickinson Research Extension Center
1133 State Avenue, Dickinson, ND 58601 Voice: (701) 483-2348 FAX: (701) 483-2005


FLEA BEETLES FOR LEAFY SPURGE CONTROL
(1998 Field Day Presentation)

Donald R. Kirby, Professor, Department of Animal and Range Sciences
Robert B. Carlson, Professor, Entomology Department

RESEARCH SUMMARY

Flea beetles were released in 1988 and 1989 at two leafy spurge infested sites near Valley City, ND. Above- and below ground characteristics of leafy spurge and the associated plant communities were measured to evaluate the effectiveness of this biocontrol agent for controlling leafy spurge.

Foliar cover, stem density, and biomass of leafy spurge were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in flea beetle release sites. Graminoid yields were significantly greater (P<0.05) in release compared to control sites. Root weights and bud densities were also reduced (P<0.05) in flea beetle release sites indicating root damage by the burrowing larvae. The decrease in leafy spurge dominance and increase in herbaceous yields should result in increased stocking rates and cattle production per unit area from successful flea beetle release sites.

INTRODUCTION

There are over 4,000 exotic plants that have been introduced into North America. Many, such as most small grains, soybeans, smooth bromegrass, crested wheatgrass, alfalfa, etc., are economically important agricultural plant species. However, approximately 10% of the introduced, exotic plant species pose economic problems to land owners and managers. One such plant in North Dakota is leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula).

Leafy spurge is an introduced plant from Eurasia that has been found to be extremely persistent and competitive on pasture and rangeland. It is one of North Dakota's longest listed noxious weeds having been added over 60 years ago (Table 1). In North Dakota, leafy spurge occupies approximately 9%, or 850,000 acres of untilled land (N.D. Dept. of Agri. 1991). Cattle do not graze leafy spurge and even avoid many infested sites resulting in an estimated reduction of direct net annual income of $23 million from livestock sales (Leistritz et al. 1992).

Leafy spurge has been difficult to control. Herbicides have been the most common method to control leafy spurge but successful treatment programs often exceed the total land value (Lym and Moxness 1989, Bangsund et al. 1996). In addition, many areas are not suitable for treatment by herbicide such as riparian zones, wetlands, woodlands, and rough terrain. Sheep and goats readily consume leafy spurge but have received limited acceptance by cattle producers and once grazing is removed, leafy spurge regrows to original densities (Lym et al. 1997). Biological control of leafy spurge using insects has expanded significantly in the 1980's and 1990's, however, limited quantitative information is available regarding these control efforts.

Eight insect species have been released in North Dakota for control of leafy spurge (Lym and Zollinger 1995). Of these, the root-feeding flea beetles (Aphthona spp.) have been the most successful for establishment, reproduction, and redistribution. This study reports on the effects of two flea beetle releases on above- and below ground characteristics of leafy spurge and the associated plant communities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flea beetles were released at two sites in east-central North Dakota. The first release was in 1988 on the Katie Olson Wildlife Management Area approximately 10 miles northwest of Valley City (called the North site). The second site was established in 1989 on private land approximately 10 miles southeast of Valley City (called the South site). Both sites were in the Sheyenne River drainage system which is highly dissected and often steeply sloping (>15%). Soils were a silty clay loam and a silty clay at the North and South sites, respectively. Both sites were typical mixed/tall grass prairie with heavy (>150 stems/yd2) infestations of leafy spurge. Annual precipitation is 18 inches for this area while approximately 20 inches were received annually over the study period.

Aboveground vegetative sampling was conducted at each site on three randomly selected and permanently located transects in control and insect released areas. Leafy spurge cover and density were estimated from eight 0.1 m2 (7.9 in x 19.7 in) quadrats positioned randomly along each transect. Leafy spurge and graminoid yields were determined by clipping and drying (60 C) four 0.1 m2 quadrats along each transect. Vegetative measurements were conducted in late July each year (1993-1995).

Leafy spurge root samples were obtained by coring soil on three random transects in control and insect release sites starting in 1989. Control sites were dropped in 1992 as the insects became established on these sites also. Five random soil cores 6 inches deep and 5 inches in diameter were collected each October from all transects. The leafy spurge roots were extracted from each soil core and washed. Root buds were recorded and the segments later dried at 60 C for dry weight determinations.

The effect of insect biocontrol on leafy spurge infested communities was evaluated as a randomized complete block design with two blocks (location) and two treatments (insect). Blocks were found nonsignificant so a completely randomized design was utilized. Vegetative and root data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA (SPSS, Inc. 1994) and mean differences were considered significant at the 5% probability level using a Tukey's h test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Foliar cover of leafy spurge was significantly (P<0.05) reduced on flea beetle release sites each year compared to control sites (Table 2). Leafy spurge cover averaged between 44 and 68% annually on control sites compared to pre-study estimates (1988) of 45% (data not shown). A six- to seven-fold reduction in leafy spurge foliar cover occurred between 1988-1989 and 1994 following flea beetle release.

Leafy spurge stem densities were also significantly reduced on flea beetle release sites compared to control sites (Table 2). Pre-study stem densities were estimated at 182 per yd2. By 1994, flea beetles had reduced leafy spurge stems nearly forty-fold to only 5 per yd2.

Stem density has been reported to influence cattle grazing behavior in leafy spurge infested pasture. Leafy spurge stem densities exceeding 80 per yd2 (100 per m2) decreased cattle use of sites (Lym and Kirby 1987). Additionally, cattle intensify use on non-infested, associated grass dominated areas creating conditions favorable for increased invasion of this noxious weed. Leafy spurge stem densities at flea beetle release sites in this study would not deter cattle from grazing these sites.

Total herbaceous yields were greater (P<0.05) on control sites each year of the study (Table 3). However, over half of the yield was contributed by leafy spurge on control sites. Leafy spurge yields were greater (P<0.05) on control sites each year, while graminoid yields were greater (P<0.05) on flea beetle release sites in 1994 and 1995. Graminoid yields increased approximately 50% between 1993 and 1995 on flea beetle release sites. Since leafy spurge density did not exceed 80 stems/yd2 on the release sites, cattle would be expected to graze this increased forage supply. This should result in an increased stocking rate and cattle production per unit area from successful flea beetle release sites.

Leafy spurge root weight and root buds were also reduced (P<0.05) in flea beetle release sites between 1988 and 1995 (Figure 1). This reduction is caused by flea beetle larvae feeding on leafy spurge roots in fall, winter and spring before emerging as adults in summer. Root dry weight decreased from 5 to 1 ounce per 64 in3 (4"x4"x4") volume of soil. Root buds decreased from over 80 per 64 in3 volume of soil to 20 by 1995. This root mass decrease is the main causative agent in the aboveground cover and density reductions in leafy spurge on the study sites.

IMPLICATIONS

The introduction of flea beetles into leafy spurge infested rangeland resulted in decreased cover, density, and biomass of leafy spurge and increased yields of grasses. However, results are not instantaneous. Root biomass was decreased in 2-3 years but beneficial aboveground changes occurred only after 5 years following insect release.

The results of this study should not be interpreted too broadly. Only two of eight flea beetle species were released in this study. Little is known of the habitat requirements of any flea beetle species. Also, soils in this study were clayey/silty and on sideslopes. Flea beetle establishment on sandy soils, overflow or subirrigated sites, and in shrubby or riparian areas have not been successful to date. Finally, successful establishment procedures are not well documented. Questions concerning soils, slope, aspect, leafy spurge density, surface soil litter, over-winter survival, initial release populations, rate of spread, etc. remain to be answered.

Table 1. North Dakota noxious weed list
Common name Listed by
Absinth wormwood 1971
Canada thistle 1891
Diffuse knapweed 1996
Field bindweed 1935
Hemp (marijuana) 1971
Hoary cress 1935
Leafy spurge 1935
Musk thistle 1971
Perennial sowthistle 1971
Purple loosestrife 1996
Russian knapweed 1935
Spotted knapweed

1983

N.D. Dept. of Agri.

 

Table 2. Foliar cover and density of leafy spurge on insect release sites in east-central North Dakota
 

Year

Plant characteristic Treatment 1993 1994 1995
 

%

Foliar cover Control 68 a1 44 a 46 a
  Insect 26 b 7 b 7 b
  #/yd2
Density Control 196 a1 193 a 193 a
  Insect 96 b 5 b 4 b
1Means within year and plant characteristic followed by a different letter differ (P<0.05).

 

Table 3. Herbaceous yield on insect release sites in east-central North Dakota
 

Year

Plant category Treatment 1993 1994 1995
  lbs/ac
Graminoids Control 819 a1 951 a 889 a
  Insect 928 a 1436 b 1360 b
Leafy spurge Control 3012 a 1016 a 1112 a
  Insect 661 b 94 b 98 b
Total herbaceous Control 3831 a 1966 a 2001 a
  Insect 1589 b 1530 b 1458 b
1Means within year and plant characteristic followed by a different letter differ (P<0.05).

 

fleebtl.bmp (157750 bytes)

Figure 1. Root dry weight and buds from soil cores following flea beetle release. 
Means by location followed by a different letter differ (P<0.05).

 

Literature Cited

Bangsund, D.A., J.A. Leitch and F.L. Leistritz. 1996. Economics of herbicide control of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). J. Agric. Res. Econ. 21:381-395.

Leistritz, F.L., F. Thompson and J.A. Leitch. 1992. Economic impact of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) in North Dakota. Weed Sci. 40:275-280.

Lym, R.G. and D.R. Kirby. 1987. Cattle foraging behavior in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) infested rangeland. Weed Tech. 1:314-318.

Lym, R.G. and K.D. Moxness. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of picloram and 2, 4-D in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula).Weed Sci. 37:498-502.

Lym, R.G., K. Sedivec and D.R. Kirby. 1997. Leafy spurge control with angora goats and herbicides. J. Range Manage. 50:123-128.

Lym, R.G. and R.K. Zollinger. 1995. Integrated management of leafy spurge. North Dakota State Univ. Ext. Ser. Bull. W-866 (rev.) 4 pgs.

North Dakota Department of Agriculture. 1991. Weed control survey by county. Bismarck, ND 58505.

SPSS, Inc. 1994. SPSS advanced statistics. 6.1. Chicago, IL.


Back to 1999 Research Reports Table of Contents
Back to Research Reports
Back to Dickinson Research Extension Center
(http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/dickinso/)
Email: drec@ndsuext.nodak.edu