Oakes Irrigation Research Site
Carrington Research Extension Center * North Dakota State University
P.O. Box 531, Oakes, ND 58474-0531, Phone: (701) 742-2744, FAX: (701) 742-2700, E-mail: Walter.Albus@ndsu.edu

 

 

Table 1.  Agronomic and quality evaluations for advanced processing selections and cultivars, full season,

Oakes, 2009.

 

 

Clone

 

% Stand

 

Vine Size1

 

Vine Maturity2

Stems per Plant

Tubers per plant

 

Specific Gravity3

%

Hollow Heart4

Black-spot Bruise5

1.  AOND95249-1Russ

99

4.5

4.0

1.7

6.0

1.1082

0

2.1

2.  AOND95292-3Russ

99

2.8

3.8

1.8

5.0

.

25

1.4

3.  ND6400C-1Russ

98

4.8

3.5

2.6

10.8

1.1019

0

1.7

4.  ND6164C-9Russ

94

2.3

1.3

1.5

5.0

1.0716

0

3.1

5.  ND6169-10Russ

96

3.5

1.5

1.7

5.6

1.0731

0

3.1

6.  ND8068-5Russ

100

1.8

1.0

2.2

5.2

1.0949

0

3.4

7.  ND8229-3

96

2.8

3.0

1.8

4.7

1.0934

38

1.2

8.  ND049546-15Russ

91

1.8

2.8

1.2

3.5

1.0905

0

2.8

9.  ND049589B-5Russ

88

3.3

4.0

1.6

6.1

1.0967

0

1.5

10.  WND8624-2Russ

96

2.8

3.0

1.9

7.1

1.0841

0

3.2

11.  WND8625-2Russ

98

4.0

1.3

2.1

5.6

1.0830

5

1.9

12.  WND8625-3Russ

98

4.0

2.5

2.2

5.6

1.0781

6

1.1

13.  Bannock Russet

93

4.3

4.0

2.6

7.1

1.0902

37

1.8

14.  Blazer Russet

96

3.3

1.8

3.3

7.3

1.0832

44

2.1

15.  Premier Russet

99

3.8

3.8

2.0

5.4

1.0929

73

2.8

16.  Ranger Russet

94

3.5

2.5

2.2

5.7

1.0954

0

4.3

17.  Russet Burbank

99

4.3

3.3

2.2

5.9

1.0859

5

2.9

18.  Russet Norkotah

94

3.0

1.0

2.0

6.6

1.0784

27

2.9

19.  Shepody

100

4.5

2.3

2.0

5.1

1.0892

6

1.9

20.  Umatilla Russet

95

3.5

1.8

2.8

9.4

1.0874

3

2.4

Mean

96

3.4

2.6

2.1

6.1

1.0988

13

2.4

LSD (µ=0.05)

8

1.0

0.8

0.4

1.5

0.1285

15

0.6

1 Vine size – scale 1-5, 1 = small, 5 = large.

2 Vine maturity – scale 1-5, 1 = early, 5 = late.

3 Determined using weight-in-air, weight-in-water method.

4 Hollow heart includes brown center.

5 Blackspot bruise determined by the abrasive peel method, scale 1-5, 1=none, 5=severe.

 

 

Table 2.  Yield and grade for advanced processing selections and cultivars, full season, Oakes, 2009. 

 

 

Clone

Total Yield

Cwt./A

US No. 1 Cwt./A

US No. 1 %

0-4 oz.

%

4-6 oz.

%

6-12 oz.

%

>12 oz.

%

 

Culls

%

1.  AOND95249-1Russ

418

382

92

5

13

56

23

3

2.  AOND95292-3Russ

323

285

88

6

16

60

12

6

3.  ND6400C-1Russ

380

240

63

35

29

31

3

3

4.  ND6164C-9Russ

299

275

92

6

17

63

12

2

5.  ND6169-10Russ

420

386

92

5

8

47

37

3

6.  ND8068-5Russ

261

212

81

18

31

43

7

2

7.  ND8229-3

304

260

85

6

14

58

12

9

8.  ND049546-15Russ

256

208

80

3

11

47

23

16

9.  ND049589B-5Russ

374

351

94

5

15

59

20

1

10.  WND8624-2Russ

451

424

94

6

18

55

21

0

11.  WND8625-2Russ

344

312

90

9

19

47

24

1

12.  WND8625-3Russ

305

252

83

15

16

47

19

2

13.  Bannock Russet

481

437

91

7

12

45

33

3

14.  Blazer Russet

430

388

90

8

21

57

13

2

15.  Premier Russet

403

365

91

6

12

50

30

3

16.  Ranger Russet

354

321

90

6

17

55

19

3

17.  Russet Burbank

412

304

74

9

14

33

27

16

18.  Russet Norkotah

422

394

93

7

14

57

23

0

19.  Shepody

440

387

88

3

8

44

36

9

20.  Umatilla Russet

419

327

78

21

32

39

7

2

Mean

374

325

86

9

17

50

20

4

LSD (µ=0.05)

90

85

7

5

9

9

14

6

 

Table 3.  Shatter bruise potential and French fry evaluations following harvest and after 8 weeks storage

at 45F, full season trial, Oakes, 2009.

 

 

Clone

 

Shatter

Bruise1

 

Fry Color2

 

Stem-end Color

%

Sugar End3

 

Fry Color2

Stem-end Color

%

Sugar End3

 

 

Field Fry

Following 8 wks. at 45°F

1.  AOND95249-1Russ

4.4

0.63

1.09

58

0.70

.078

17

2.  AOND95292-3Russ

1.6

0.58

0.58

0

0.30

0.30

0

3.  ND6400C-1Russ

1.5

0.40

0.53

25

0.44

0.53

17

4.  ND6164C-9Russ

2.1

1.04

1.34

17

1.13

1.33

42

5.  ND6169-10Russ

2.3

1.00

1.38

25

1.79

1.79

0

6.  ND8068-5Russ

2.0

0.40

0.53

25

0.35

0.49

17

7.  ND8229-3

1.8

0.45

0.45

0

0.40

0.40

0

8.  ND049546-15Russ

1.5

0.45

0.96

67

0.35

0.69

33

9.  ND049589B-5Russ

2.0

0.35

0.41

8

0.25

0.31

8

10.  WND8624-2Russ

2.3

0.88

0.88

0

1.38

1.5

8

11.  WND8625-2Russ

2.7

0.84

0.92

17

0.58

0.63

8

12.  WND8625-3Russ

2.0

2.00

2.00

0

1.54

1.54

0

13.  Bannock Russet

1.9

0.79

1.09

25

1.71

2.0

25

14.  Blazer Russet

2.4

1.50

1.50

0

0.88

1.17

25

15.  Premier Russet

1.3

0.48

0.48

0

0.49

0.79

13

16.  Ranger Russet

2.3

0.58

0.94

67

0.75

1.17

25

17.  Russet Burbank

1.4

0.71

1.00

42

0.96

1.79

67

18.  Russet Norkotah

2.1

1.25

1.42

17

2.0

2.0

0

19.  Shepody

1.8

1.38

1.58

25

1.04

1.50

42

20.  Umatilla Russet

1.3

0.63

1.08

75

0.63

0.75

25

Mean

2.0

0.82

1.01

25

0.89

1.08

19

LSD (α = 0.05)

2.0

0.61

0.59

43

0.66

0.79

47

1Shatter bruise is evaluated using a bruising chamber with digger chain link baffles.  Tubers are stored at

 45°F prior bruising.  Shatter bruises are rated on a scale of 1-5, with 1 = none and 5 = many and severe.

2Fry color scores:  0.1 corresponds to 000, 0.3 corresponds to 00, 0.5 corresponds to 0, 1.0 equals 1.0

 and subsequent numbers follow rating scale 000 to 4.0.

3Any stem end darker than the main fry is considered a sugar end, the worst case scenario.  The

 processing industry defines a sugar end as a 3.0 or darker. 

 

Return to Potato variety material and methods

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site 2009 Annual Report

Go to Oakes Irrigation Research Site home page