You are here: Home Columns Livestock Market Advisor Market Advisor: Tax Implications for Forced Sales of Livestock Due to Drought
 
Document Actions

Market Advisor: Tax Implications for Forced Sales of Livestock Due to Drought

Livestock producers who are forced to sell livestock due to drought conditions may receive special consideration for federal income tax reporting purposes.

By Tim Petry, Livestock Marketing Economist

NDSU Extension Service

Extremely dry weather conditions are occurring again in parts of the northern Plains. High feed and fuel prices likely will limit the options livestock producers have for dealing with the loss of forage. If the dry weather continues, forced liquidation of breeding livestock and early sales of market livestock may be necessary.

Livestock producers who are forced to sell livestock due to drought conditions may receive special consideration for federal income tax reporting purposes.

Income tax reporting for forced sales of livestock because of drought or other weather-related conditions may be handled in two different ways, according to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines.

The first provision applies to all types of livestock and allows postponement for reporting income from forced sales for one year. For example, the normal business practice for a beef cattle producer may be to background calves after fall weaning and market them the next February. If, due to drought conditions and lack of feed supplies, the calves are marketed at weaning in October, the income may be postponed until the next year. Only sales in excess of normal (normal usually is defined as the average number sold in the last three years) qualify for the deferral.

The drought must have caused an area to be designated as eligible for assistance by the federal government. However, the livestock do not have to be raised or sold in the exact designated drought area, such as a particular county, but only in proximity.

To qualify, the livestock owner’s principal business must be farming or ranching and the cash method of accounting must be used.

The other IRS provision applies to the forced sale of draft, breeding and dairy animals, but excludes poultry. If these animals are sold due to drought, the sale may be treated as an involuntary conversion.

Producers can choose to postpone reporting the capital gain from forced sales as long as similar animals are repurchased in the future. For example, a sheep producer normally markets 25 cull ewes each year, but in a drought year is forced to sell 50 head. Only the additional 25 head that will be replaced later are eligible for the involuntary conversion.

Typically, the replacement period for involuntary conversion ends two years after the close of the tax year of when the gain occurs.

However, when livestock are sold due to drought conditions in an area eligible for federal assistance, producers have four years to replace the livestock. The IRS may extend the replacement period on a regional basis if drought conditions continue for a longer period. Each year, the IRS publishes a list of eligible counties where the replacement period is extended.

More information on the procedure for extending the replacement period and the list of counties eligible for extension through 2007 is available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-07-80.pdf.

Also, if it is “not practical” for the producer to reinvest in the same class of livestock, other classes of livestock or property (except real property) used for farming or ranching may qualify as replacement property.

The IRS tax code is complex, so livestock producers considering marketing livestock at abnormal times due to dry conditions should consult with their tax adviser. Other tax management tools, such as income averaging, also may be considered.


NDSU Agriculture Communication

Source:Tim Petry, (701) 231-7469, tim.petry@ndsu.edu
Editor:Rich Mattern, (701) 231-6136, richard.mattern@ndsu.edu
ND State Fair
4-H State Fair Results
Columns
Dairy Focus: Dairy Focus: Balance Rations to Avoid Rumen Problems  (2010-02-04)  Including too much corn in the dairy cow ration could lead to health problems.  FULL STORY
Biofuel Economics: New Energy Economics: Electrical Grid Potentially Can Handle 20 Percent Wind Energy  (2010-02-02)  The expansion of electrical transmission infrastructure will provide more flexibility to balance load demands, generation potential and geographic diversity.  FULL STORY
BeefTalk: BeefTalk: We Want to Avoid the Word ‘Baffling’ for Good Reason  (2010-02-04)  To be “baffled” would imply the progeny results based on mating plans were confusing or perplexing.  FULL STORY
Hortiscope: Hortiscope  (2010-02-03)  Ron Smith answers questions about flowers, trees, gardens and shrubs.  FULL STORY
Livestock Market Advisor: Market Advisor: Beef Cow Herd Continues to Shrink  (2010-02-05)  The reduction in the U.S. beef cow herd and lower numbers of cattle on feed should result in lower cattle slaughter and declining beef production.  FULL STORY
Prairie Fare: Prairie Fare: Give Broccoli a Chance  (2010-02-04)  If you bypassed broccoli in your younger years, give it another chance.   FULL STORY
 
Use of Releases
The news media and others may use these news releases in their entirety. If the articles are edited, the sources and NDSU must be given credit.
 

Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System