You are here: Home Columns BeefTalk BeefTalk: Bulls Furloughed Until Mid-July
 
Document Actions

BeefTalk: Bulls Furloughed Until Mid-July

Images
Why Dead Calves? Why Dead Calves?
The discussion of calving date is a real example of a question caught in the middle of long- and short-term planning for many beef producers.

By Kris Ringwall, Beef Specialist

NDSU Extension Service

Just as the weather changes, so do agricultural operations. There are long- and short-term plans, but the actual work generally is somewhere in the middle. Planning is important because, without a long-term plan, it is very hard to have a short-term plan.

The long-term plan is more goal oriented, while the short-term plan is more procedural. The discussion of calving date is a real example of a question caught in the middle of long- and short-term planning for many beef producers. The goal is fairly well-known. As cattle producers in the northern Plains, the goal has been to have 3- to 4-week-old calves ready to turn out to pasture. These calves are ready to gain weight and do well mowing through the cool-season grasses followed by delicious warm-season grasses and finally some fresh fall regrowth for dessert.

The result is typical northern calves gaining more than 2.5 pounds a day and weighing in excess of 635 pounds at roughly 7 months of age. With typical bull turnout dates the first week of June, the cows start calving early to mid-March. For many beef producers, 85-plus percent of the cows calve within 42 days from the start of calving, so essentially, almost 90 percent of the calves are on the ground, worked and ready to turn out to cool-season grasses, such as crested wheat grass, May 1.

Following a few weeks at home in the backgrounding lots, these calves sell well late fall and early winter. Feedlots are anxious for their arrival and completion always has been good for these calves. Thus, for most producers, the long-term goal is to sell as many of these performance-oriented calves as they can, then settle into winter and get ready for the next calving season.

Even in the most critical coffee setting, those who were successful with this production model never budged. The process works. “Don’t fix what is not broken,” was the conclusion of the day. However, times are changing and, for some, the short-term goal has been more like, “Let’s simply get through this winter.”

Too many cows and not enough space, help, bedding, feed, time or just plain not enough result in dead calves. If one were to ask what a typical calf death rate is, the current benchmark for those producers who utilize the CHAPS program through the North Dakota Beef Cattle Improvement Association is 3.26 percent, or three to four dead calves per 100 cows.

A benchmark is a notation for pondering and, we hope, it can add some confidence for some self-assessment. At the Dickinson Research Extension Center, a pattern has slowly developed. With a typical traditional management approach at calving, the center has a 3 to 4 percent calf death loss. Pondering that number and reflecting on the typical number the CHAPS producers achieve across North Dakota, one would conclude that the center also is typical.

Being typical does not mean one cannot improve or be better, but does it mean one needs to watch costs closely because costs may go up exponentially as one tries to approach a zero percent death loss. So maybe typical also is a good guide for practical. However, having mentioned costs, the center has and continues to move calving from the traditional practices to more extensive, less labor-intensive inputs and to a more “mother and nature process.”

The trend in calf death loss for these cattle has not been positive. In fact, the calf death loss seems to be more in the 6 to 8 percent range. Essentially, this means the doubling of calf death loss. Twice, as severe northern winters directed their wrath at the center, calf death loss has exceeded 10 percent. The labor savings are difficult to advocate, given the center’s attempts at a more extensive, less labor-intensive calving system during March in southwestern North Dakota.

The bottom line: More labor is not coming, costs are increasing and so is the value of live calves. The only thing that is not increasing is the value of a dead calf. Long-term goals have been set. However, short-term objectives are not being met, so long-term goals need to be modified. The center will be calving later, so the bulls will be furloughed until mid-July.

May you find all your ear tags.

Your comments are always welcome at http://www.BeefTalk.com.

For more information, contact Ringwall, 1041 State Ave., Dickinson, ND 58601, or go to http://www.CHAPS2000.com on the Internet.

(Ringwall is a North Dakota State University Extension Service livestock specialist and the Dickinson Research Extension Center director.)


NDSU Agriculture Communication – April 14, 2011

Source:Kris Ringwall, (701) 483-2348, ext. 103, kris.ringwall@ndsu.edu
Editor:Rich Mattern, (701) 231-6136, richard.mattern@ndsu.edu
Attachments
PDF - Why Dead Calves? Preview
(bt041411.pdf - 14.45 Kb)
EPS - Why Dead Calves?
(bt041411.eps - 205.94 Kb)
ND State Fair
4-H State Fair Results
Columns
Spotlight on Economics: Spotlight on Economics: China’s Growing Demand for Meat  (2014-10-24)  Recent studies suggest that total average per capita meat consumption in China could grow from about 60 kilograms in 2010 to nearly 100 kg per person per year by 2030.  FULL STORY
BeefTalk: BeefTalk: Change, It’s in Your Mind  (2014-10-30)  The needs of today’s cattle industry are not the same as yesteryear’s needs.   FULL STORY
Prairie Fare: Prairie Fare: Hand Washing Really Does Cut Illness Rates  (2014-10-30)  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention refers to hand washing as the single most important means of preventing the spread of disease.  FULL STORY
 
Use of Releases
The news media and others may use these news releases in their entirety. If the articles are edited, the sources and NDSU must be given credit.
 

Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System